Jack Black
09-10-2008, 01:48 PM
On 3 October 2008, the BBC reported thus:
Gang leader Mark Nunes was shot dead as he held a gun to a security guard's head outside the HSBC branch in Chandler's Ford.
A second man, Andrew Markland, 36, was also shot and killed during the raid.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/h...re/7645757.stm
Mark Nunes and Andrew Markland are pictured below:
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/45075000/jpg/_45075598_nunes&markland_226.jpg
Four men have been convicted over a series of armed robberies across southern England, which ended when police shot dead two gang members.
The defendants, from London, conspired to organise or execute up to 21 robberies on banks or cash box delivery guards, netting £500,000.
Their 18-month campaign ended when the gang leaders were shot dead by armed officers outside a bank in Hampshire.
3 "dark-skinned" (an oft-used current euphemism) gentlemen and a wigger are pictured below:
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/45075000/jpg/_45075486_gang4_226.jpg
If you ever felt discouraged about the way things are going, take a look at the comments underneath the corresponding Daily Mail
article.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-marksmen.html
The Mail stopped the commentary at just after 5.00 pm.
I guess the PC censors couldn't cope with all the non-enrichment patter.
Here are a few comments to be going on with:
Cracking result. Good for the Police.
He won't do that again will he? Fairly simple.
Commit violent crime be prepared to suffer the consequences, at least there are two guys who the tax payer will not have to fund for the next 15 years.
A good result for the police and society as a whole. Well done boys.
At one point in the congratulatory contentment an upstanding member of the PC Crowd named Charles interjected thus:
The Police shoud have tried to apprehend the suspect and not shoot to kill them. Violence is not the answer. We need to understand why these criminals commit the crimes and not act like a bunch of savages.
Here are a few of the responses Charles' intervention provoked:
I'll tell you why ' charles of London ' that criminals do what they do - its because of bleeding heart liberals like yourself who would rather see them out on the street than being locked up forever - remember they were ' career criminals.
Perhaps the police could have sent a letter out to these criminals inviting them to give themselves up? Get real Charles from London. These people are ruthless scum who are prepared to do anything to get what they want. The police officers who were on this operation showed great courage and skill - well done. Lets stop hugging trees and fight force with force.
We all understand why people do this - for greed! And what would you do Charles - ask the robber politely to stop pointing the gun at the Security Guard's head? If you go out with a gun you expect to use it and quite frankly, if thats what it takes to stop them then sobeit. That gunman wouldnt have hestitated to use his weapon on the poor guy trying to do his job.
Well done the police. I completely disagree with Charles above. It is people with views like him that the government has heeded for too long. Hardened criminals do not listen to talk. The only thing that they understand & respect is force. So if that is what it takes, fine by me. Anything to get rid of the scum in our society.
Charles your an idiot, these criminals need to be made an example of your either blind or are PC get a life and see whats going on here.Well done to the police.
Charles, are you a complete bozo? Let me help you out here; the reason they commit crimes is because THEY ARE THE BADDIES!!!!!
Charles what planet are you on.. asked them why they are doing it.. give me a break ... MONEY thats why they do it.. they dont want to work they steal thats what they do..If they hadnt shot him then he would have shot the Guard...One less on the streets.
Charles, are you a social worker? you are part of what is wrong with the uk . get this slime off the streets, preferably permanently as was the case here.
I would have taken a bet that some lily livered liberal would come up with your comment...Let me tell you CHARLES...They commit these crimes because they are avaricious criminals with no morals and no mercy...I am sure if you had been the driver of the security van you would have sat these potential murderers down and listened to how they had been misunderstood and abused as children.. I say to you..'Get real'.
Here are the only other namby-pamby comments.
Aren't the police supposed to identify themselves first or something ? or say 'armed police drop your weapon'? Im not saying this chap didn't deserve his comeuppance but this is not Brazil or Colombia yet is it ?
Anton Markham, London.
Am slightly concerned about this (assuming the report is accurate): if the police definitely knew that the gang were going to launch another attack, could they not have intercepted them first or apprehended them earlier, especially if they had been "monitored"? The presence of the video camera and marksmen etc. make it look like something of an assassination waiting to happen, which is disturbing.
A.N, London.
I agree with Charles of London. There was no need to kill. From the report there were plenty of police involved. He was well outnumbered and could have been apprehended without murdering him. Murder is still murder and cannot be excused just because they (police) have been bought by the state. Surprised at so many applauding this.
Jess, Luton.
Tony of London responded to these and Charles thus:
Its you fools that got him killed. Once upon a time the police could have proved he was going to do the job and stopped it before it happened. Now you halfwit liberals require absolute proof they were going to do it, and if there are plans, maps, guns they argue that's not evidence as he hasn't actually done it yet and is innocent. So that leaves catching them in the act. You liberals wanted it, you got it.
I tried to put this in The Mail myself but they weren't having it:
Anton in London: go live in Haiti; A.N. in London: go live in Somalia; Jess in Luton: go live in Johannesburg; Charles in London: go live in Rwanda.
On second thoughts, get out of your gated communities and go live in Brixton.
Are you guys politicians, media darlings, PC activists, credit crunch bankers or lovely, fluffy immigrants by any chance? If you are any or all of the above, Tottenham, Harlesden and Hackney are nice places to socialise too!
As for the rest of you folks, which of these would you vote for if you still could? Edward Heath; Margaret Thatcher; Tony Blair; Gordon Brown or Enoch Powell?
I guess you know who gets my vote.
And I'm not a Tory!
Anyway, ladies and gentlemen, there appears to be a hell of a lot of politically incorrect, anti-establishment sentiment out there.
There were 53 comments entered into The Daily Mail's Have Your Say section before the censors pulled the plug and just 4 of these thought the police acted inappropriately.
I don't know how many of those who expressed a view were Nationalists but I would have thought that most were not.
YET!
A lot more do seem to be catching on though, don't they? I hope many of these will be voting for their own in 2010. However, given the strength of feeling seen here, it wouldn't surprise me at all if someone lit the blue touch paper before then.
Gang leader Mark Nunes was shot dead as he held a gun to a security guard's head outside the HSBC branch in Chandler's Ford.
A second man, Andrew Markland, 36, was also shot and killed during the raid.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/h...re/7645757.stm
Mark Nunes and Andrew Markland are pictured below:
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/45075000/jpg/_45075598_nunes&markland_226.jpg
Four men have been convicted over a series of armed robberies across southern England, which ended when police shot dead two gang members.
The defendants, from London, conspired to organise or execute up to 21 robberies on banks or cash box delivery guards, netting £500,000.
Their 18-month campaign ended when the gang leaders were shot dead by armed officers outside a bank in Hampshire.
3 "dark-skinned" (an oft-used current euphemism) gentlemen and a wigger are pictured below:
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/45075000/jpg/_45075486_gang4_226.jpg
If you ever felt discouraged about the way things are going, take a look at the comments underneath the corresponding Daily Mail
article.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-marksmen.html
The Mail stopped the commentary at just after 5.00 pm.
I guess the PC censors couldn't cope with all the non-enrichment patter.
Here are a few comments to be going on with:
Cracking result. Good for the Police.
He won't do that again will he? Fairly simple.
Commit violent crime be prepared to suffer the consequences, at least there are two guys who the tax payer will not have to fund for the next 15 years.
A good result for the police and society as a whole. Well done boys.
At one point in the congratulatory contentment an upstanding member of the PC Crowd named Charles interjected thus:
The Police shoud have tried to apprehend the suspect and not shoot to kill them. Violence is not the answer. We need to understand why these criminals commit the crimes and not act like a bunch of savages.
Here are a few of the responses Charles' intervention provoked:
I'll tell you why ' charles of London ' that criminals do what they do - its because of bleeding heart liberals like yourself who would rather see them out on the street than being locked up forever - remember they were ' career criminals.
Perhaps the police could have sent a letter out to these criminals inviting them to give themselves up? Get real Charles from London. These people are ruthless scum who are prepared to do anything to get what they want. The police officers who were on this operation showed great courage and skill - well done. Lets stop hugging trees and fight force with force.
We all understand why people do this - for greed! And what would you do Charles - ask the robber politely to stop pointing the gun at the Security Guard's head? If you go out with a gun you expect to use it and quite frankly, if thats what it takes to stop them then sobeit. That gunman wouldnt have hestitated to use his weapon on the poor guy trying to do his job.
Well done the police. I completely disagree with Charles above. It is people with views like him that the government has heeded for too long. Hardened criminals do not listen to talk. The only thing that they understand & respect is force. So if that is what it takes, fine by me. Anything to get rid of the scum in our society.
Charles your an idiot, these criminals need to be made an example of your either blind or are PC get a life and see whats going on here.Well done to the police.
Charles, are you a complete bozo? Let me help you out here; the reason they commit crimes is because THEY ARE THE BADDIES!!!!!
Charles what planet are you on.. asked them why they are doing it.. give me a break ... MONEY thats why they do it.. they dont want to work they steal thats what they do..If they hadnt shot him then he would have shot the Guard...One less on the streets.
Charles, are you a social worker? you are part of what is wrong with the uk . get this slime off the streets, preferably permanently as was the case here.
I would have taken a bet that some lily livered liberal would come up with your comment...Let me tell you CHARLES...They commit these crimes because they are avaricious criminals with no morals and no mercy...I am sure if you had been the driver of the security van you would have sat these potential murderers down and listened to how they had been misunderstood and abused as children.. I say to you..'Get real'.
Here are the only other namby-pamby comments.
Aren't the police supposed to identify themselves first or something ? or say 'armed police drop your weapon'? Im not saying this chap didn't deserve his comeuppance but this is not Brazil or Colombia yet is it ?
Anton Markham, London.
Am slightly concerned about this (assuming the report is accurate): if the police definitely knew that the gang were going to launch another attack, could they not have intercepted them first or apprehended them earlier, especially if they had been "monitored"? The presence of the video camera and marksmen etc. make it look like something of an assassination waiting to happen, which is disturbing.
A.N, London.
I agree with Charles of London. There was no need to kill. From the report there were plenty of police involved. He was well outnumbered and could have been apprehended without murdering him. Murder is still murder and cannot be excused just because they (police) have been bought by the state. Surprised at so many applauding this.
Jess, Luton.
Tony of London responded to these and Charles thus:
Its you fools that got him killed. Once upon a time the police could have proved he was going to do the job and stopped it before it happened. Now you halfwit liberals require absolute proof they were going to do it, and if there are plans, maps, guns they argue that's not evidence as he hasn't actually done it yet and is innocent. So that leaves catching them in the act. You liberals wanted it, you got it.
I tried to put this in The Mail myself but they weren't having it:
Anton in London: go live in Haiti; A.N. in London: go live in Somalia; Jess in Luton: go live in Johannesburg; Charles in London: go live in Rwanda.
On second thoughts, get out of your gated communities and go live in Brixton.
Are you guys politicians, media darlings, PC activists, credit crunch bankers or lovely, fluffy immigrants by any chance? If you are any or all of the above, Tottenham, Harlesden and Hackney are nice places to socialise too!
As for the rest of you folks, which of these would you vote for if you still could? Edward Heath; Margaret Thatcher; Tony Blair; Gordon Brown or Enoch Powell?
I guess you know who gets my vote.
And I'm not a Tory!
Anyway, ladies and gentlemen, there appears to be a hell of a lot of politically incorrect, anti-establishment sentiment out there.
There were 53 comments entered into The Daily Mail's Have Your Say section before the censors pulled the plug and just 4 of these thought the police acted inappropriately.
I don't know how many of those who expressed a view were Nationalists but I would have thought that most were not.
YET!
A lot more do seem to be catching on though, don't they? I hope many of these will be voting for their own in 2010. However, given the strength of feeling seen here, it wouldn't surprise me at all if someone lit the blue touch paper before then.