Saudi Arabia's Nuclear Ambitions!

[veerar]

Talking of WMD,Iran and North korea etc,many forget the Saudis have been pursuing a secret plan to acquire WND with the help of Pakistan,with whom ,the Royal Kingdom, has a special relationship.
http://www.nti.org/e_research/e3_40a.html
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/saudi/index.html
http://www.washtimes.com/world/20031021-112804-8451r.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_nuclear_weapons
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/004092.php
There are many more links available.
With the type of special relationship,with the west,will the Saudis get away with it?
Saudi Arabia - In 2003 members of the government stated that due to the worsening relations with the USA, Saudi Arabia was being forced to consider the development of nuclear weapons. However, so far they have denied that they are making any attempt to produce them.[17] It has been rumored that Pakistan has transferred several nuclear weapons to Saudi Arabia, but this is unconfirmed.[18] In March 2006 the German magazine Cicero reported that Saudi Arabia had since 2003 received assistance from Pakistan to acquire nuclear missiles and warheads. Satellite photos allegedly reveal an underground city and nuclear silos with Ghauri rockets south of the capital Riyadh.[19] Pakistan has denied aiding Saudi Arabia in any nuclear ambitions.[20]
The last para is from the wikipedia,link above

[janahitwadi]

It is a mad race. Saudis have lot of money. They don't know where to keep it. Let every one have it and destroy this earth. So no worry.

The real solution is to develop alternate fuel. Stop dependence on 'oil' and the result would be middle east would forget about nuclear weapons.

[WESTERN RANGER]

veerar/ They have the funds that's a fact however devolepment of such things in that location is something that Israel would "never" allow.Also the items of such technology requires a vast industrial complex unless they have
blackmarketed the Plutonium.Centrafuges and such things simply can't be hidden in the sand.As for the Pakistani connection i just don't see that as very plauseable,unless Saudi paid for Pakistans development cost.With the
proviso of gaining the weapons for themselves.Think how nice and dangerous
this makes the situation,both of these countries are most likely to turn fundamentalist.Imagine O.B.L. in charge in Saudi if that happened,it sure makes Iran look like small change!!!!!

[von-Scharnhorst]

It is no use replying to Veerar. You may have noticed the "BANNED" under his name?

Means he can't read the question, or any way, can not reply.

[WESTERN RANGER]

Thanks for telling me that Von Scharnhorst to tell the truth i thought he had
placed the banned there himself,as a kind of afectation.Anyway what did he
do he seemed quite inofensive to me.Then again i haven't had as much time
as i would like to keep abreast of the webposts.

[Crowly]

Why was he banned? Why would anyone be banned?

[von-Scharnhorst]

Spaming. If any one wants to write, and give their opinions, on a site, then all are most welcome.

Also welcome are links to sites that prove, or disprove, depending on your view, a subject or point.

What IS wrong, is when you get endless links to sites with which you are linked or even own, that are also, quite per chance, FULL to overbriming with advertising.

THAT is theft of computer space.

If you wish to be a contributing member of a site, then fair enough. Yopu do not use that site to merely advertise your own.

[janahitwadi]

Saudis may not be interested in developing nuclear weapons. They have financially supported Pakistan for development and Pakistan can sell weapons to Saudis on payment. Muslims are so obsessed with Islam they can do any thing to destroy others. Of course these weapons would destroy them too. Nuclear weapons do not understand human religion. They only follow chemistry and physics laws.

[Crowly]

Alright, for god's sake, we get it. You dislike Pakistan. Every indian dislikes pakistan. YOU built nuclear weapons first, remember that.

[janahitwadi]

There is a reason for disliking Pakistan. It is a terrorist country. Almost all terrorists are trained in Pakistan. Government of Pakistan encourages all terrorists ready to do any thing even at cost of their life.

Knowing this USA is supporting Pakistan. It appears there might be some reason and Pakistan is blackmailing USA.

Do you like Pakistan? Will you care to give some reasons if you like Pakistan?

Yes we did take nuclear test ahead of Pakistan. We need it as other nuclear countries have huge storage of nuclear weapons. India did not sale the technology to any other nation. India shall not do this in future too. Have you found credibility of Pakistan?

[von-Scharnhorst]

Yes we did take nuclear test ahead of Pakistan. We need it as other nuclear countries have huge storage of nuclear weapons.
As of yestaerday afternoon, I have twenty muskets 16 pistols and around 30 asoreted sabres, swords and cutlasses in my cellar, I have two 24 pound cannon, 3 x 12 pounders, and 3 x 6 pounders in my garden,.

Do you think my neigbours should immediately run out and buy a couple of dozen muskets, just in case?

[solidsteam]

Can you all tell me, why some countries can have nuclear weapons while others can't. Why Israel has this mass distruction weapons, while all the surrounding countries are band.

[von-Scharnhorst]

There is no proof that Israel does have them. Therefore nothing can be done.

However, you have two neigbours, one is a solicitor, goes out to work every day, drives a Lexus, Wife two kids, mows the lawn on Sunday, and take Johnny to the little legue.

The other, is a ranting, two bottle a day, mad man, regularly arrested for threatening neigbours, throws bricks through peoples windows who complain, spray paints his name all over town, has done five to ten in Prison for attempted murder, and is trying to harras the next door family out so his mates can move in.

Which one would YOU trust with a gun?

[solidsteam]

Very true, but if you have read their history, Israelis were brought to Palestine from all over the world, while the real residants were butchered and pushed out of their homes and land. so, you tell me now, which one fits your cases.
Anyway I know that mass destruction weapons should be banned from the world or allowed all over, where we will see humans demolished.

[von-Scharnhorst]

Very true, but if you have read their history, Israelis were brought to Palestine from all over the world, while the real residants were butchered and pushed out of their homes and land.
Yet we here endlessly from muslim gob pieces, that all this stemmed from the "crusades"

FUCK me!!! 700 bloody years ago, and these wa***rs are STILL complaining.

Is THAT rational?

I will agree that they have a case against Israel and the U.K, U.S for bad planning in the Middle East. But that is hardly mentionesd when burning embassys over cartoons, or shooting nuns for what some old git from Rome sais.

[solidsteam]

Well, we all know that we have extreemists in all ways of life, religion and politics cannot be dismissed, we have christains and jewish extrimists, in their own brutal ways. but how can we all help in this chaos.

[janahitwadi]

Well, we all know that we have extreemists in all ways of life, religion and politics cannot be dismissed, we have christains and jewish extrimists, in their own brutal ways. but how can we all help in this chaos.
I have said in discussions on some other thread that all nations in the world should have nation as their religion. This religion would have:

brotherhood as the fundamental principle just like any other religion, past or present.
Constitution of nation as the rules of religion.
Laws of nation and civil laws as the Laws of religion.
Worship the way one desires as long as it doesn't disturb others.Probably this would be the best solution. At least I have firm belief in this solution.

[solidsteam]

I completly agree with you. But people in authority won't allow things to go the way we'd like to, they need more power, and can't get it unless they make these tribulations.

[von-Scharnhorst]

Just tell religion to shove it's self up it's arse. Then we can get on with real life.

Simple.

[the_chauffeur]

Saudi is really cosy with the US so why are people shitting themselves ?

[the_chauffeur]

There is a reason for disliking Pakistan. It is a terrorist country. Almost all terrorists are trained in Pakistan. Government of Pakistan encourages all terrorists ready to do any thing even at cost of their life.

Knowing this USA is supporting Pakistan. It appears there might be some reason and Pakistan is blackmailing USA.

Do you like Pakistan? Will you care to give some reasons if you like Pakistan?

Yes we did take nuclear test ahead of Pakistan. We need it as other nuclear countries have huge storage of nuclear weapons. India did not sale the technology to any other nation. India shall not do this in future too. Have you found credibility of Pakistan?

You're an idiot. Pakistan is an ally of America's War on Terror, so why would they pick a "terrorist nation" to ally with ? Tool

[Lathyrus]

There are two sides to Pakistan. One good, one very bad.

Solaris, solaris solaris....

[the_chauffeur]

You know something the US government doesn't ? :rolleyes:

[von-Scharnhorst]

You're an idiot.
THAT IS A PERSONAL ATTACK. PERSONAL ATTACKS WILL NOT BE TOLERATED ON THESE BOARDS!

[von-Scharnhorst]

Saudi is really cosy with the US so why are people shitting themselves ?
Lessons from the Shah of Perssia, by any chance?

The area is as stable as a chocolate tea pot.

[the_chauffeur]

THAT IS A PERSONAL ATTACK. PERSONAL ATTACKS WILL NOT BE TOLERATED ON THESE BOARDS!


Neither is writing in caps :rolleyes:

[the_chauffeur]

Lessons from the Shah of Perssia, by any chance?

The area is as stable as a chocolate tea pot.

Who cares. The US will spring into action to protect Saudi either way.

[von-Scharnhorst]

Like they did against the Ayatollah in Iran you mean?

VERY effective THAT was.

[WESTERN RANGER]

The Saudi Arabian Royal Family is real cosy with the U.S.not the Saudi people.
Islamic fundamentalism could break out there any time.Bin Laden is waiting to step into the vacum left by the preening Saudi Princes.That is the reason for the
brutal conditions and laws in that Emirate.The Saudi royals have had a very good run,also they own twenty percent of The United States.However they are
hated by their own people who would much rather see a Islamic state than the present 22 thousand member royal family.The Saudi thought police keep
the people down,but then so did the Shah of Iran.Until a holy man kicked him
out,their faith is far too strong for even a dictatorship like Saudi to keep the
Genie in the bottle forever.They will fall to fundamentalists sooner or later.

[the_chauffeur]

Like they did against the Ayatollah in Iran you mean?

VERY effective THAT was.

More like the first Gulf War ;)

[Lathyrus]

There are two sides to Pakistan. One good, one very bad.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/6143754.stm

[von-Scharnhorst]

"It has already introduced measures such as the banning of music on public transport."
DAMN. I agree with them on that one.

[Lathyrus]

DAMN. I agree with them on that one.



I believe women are treated badly enough in Pakistan, without bringing in Taleban law.

[von-Scharnhorst]

I mEANT the music on public transport. NOT the rest of it.

However. I do not want them imposing their laws on Europe. So What they do in their own country is up to them.

[Lathyrus]

However. I do not want them imposing their laws on Europe. So What they do in their own country is up to them.

So what if the billions of Pakistanis in this country want impose Taleban rule?

[von-Scharnhorst]

I SAID, now read cvarefully. This is the second time;

However. I do not want them imposing their laws on Europe.
Clear enough for you?

[janahitwadi]

How can one accept rules and laws of other nation or some religion?