Expounder

Originally Posted by Expounder

This culture of anti social arrogance and violence has been prevalent since the 60s the rot set in when the first the first offspring of the 50s migrants started school. It started with small gangs in state schools intent on preventing the teaching of students, disrupting classes making it difficult for teachers to do their job. The sheer scale of this was a new phenomenon and no one knew how to handle this. I can vouch for this as my son was one of the victims of this mindless activity which was also the reason for the deterioration of education in state schools. during the 60s which went slowly downhill since.

From this, the local gang culture was born, and over the years all hues of governments and parties back peddled and bent over backward to placate and excuse this

...

Originally Posted by Expounder

Clegg and co had a choice, they may argue that the Labour brand was tired and tainted and that they had to make the other choice on the basis of the pre election promises made by Cameron to the electorate. In the mix, was the attraction of the power and the glory of ministerial posts in government. The glint in Vince Cables eyes during the negotiations of trying to form a coalition government as they went from one meeting to another told me they couldn't believe their luck at the outcome of the election result.

Lets suppose we accept the Lib Dem argument about the choice they made. After over a year in office they can see that that all of the promises made by Cameron to the electorate have been broken.They were stiched up on the AV referendum by Cameron and the Tory and Murdoch

...

Originally Posted by Expounder

Poor response to my post Major shame on you, a classroom jibe because I missed an O in my
percentages , and a juvenile answer to the points I raised, which were totally ignored, and which are all factual. Do you dispute that Cameron lied when he addressed the pathologists? When he's admitted that all he's doing now was planned while in opposition. Do you agree or disagree that the casino bankers want to get back to gambling with our savings and pension funds who reap all the benefits when they win, and pass the debt onto the ordinary tax payer when they lose? Are any "ring fenced" non casino mortgage and savings banks to be set up to protect the man in the street from a shower gambling crooked shysters?

You sneer about the provenance of the Daily Mirror there

...

Originally Posted by Expounder

There will be no seismic shift towards the BNP, if nothing else, "The Battle For Barking" exposed the BNP and it's associated organisations like the EDL, filled with violent racist thugs many recruited from the extreme end of the violent football minority. By it's nature it also attracts the psychopathic violent in society who find these organisations an ideal outlet for venting their pent up twisted hate.

What sane person would vote for a party of mature adult political thugs, the program if anything put the final nail in the BNP coffin by exposing the underlying smoldering hate and potential violent behaviour of it's members which will no doubt have knock on effect on the the English Defence League.

I would like to congratulate the program makers

...

Originally Posted by Expounder

What pathetic excuse Clegg offers for a "breakdown" in talks with Labour, his sell out to Cameron was already a done deal before he ever spoke to them. He couldn't wait to put his signature to it.

The smell of the crumbs of a morsel of power and the ministerial perks that go with it was enough Lib Dem leadership betray their principles and the principles of their members. The Lib Dems are finished as serious political party, as their leaders are prepared to throw their lot in with the Tories for minor seats at the table. They have been absorbed into the Tory party machine.I believe Lib Dem members will split into factions at the next General Election as the party they belonged to no longer exists.

The debates: Nick Clegg "The Tories are linked

...