Legalize all drugs?
Posted 02-08-2008 at 11:27 PM by Marxist Nutter
Even the mention of the idea of legalizing drugs starts many people frothing at the mouth,
quick to scream and shout about the dangers of drugs. But these are the very people that should be interested in some arguments for legalization. I am not going to dispute that drugs have a harmful affect on many people's lives - they do. I would however submit for debate the opinion that our drugs laws (UK)in fact exacerbate the problem, by obscuring its true depth, arbitrarily classing drugs with scant regard for the actual relative dangers of these substances (thus confusing the public on the issue) and spending huge amounts of money in arresting and locking up addicts who never change their ways.
The case I wish to make starts from the following premises:
1.Drugs policy up to now has failed. More people die of drugs (be they alcohol, tobacco or heroin) than ever before. Thus the need for the re-think
2. We need a policy that can deliver treatment to those that need it and put drug dealers out of business once and for all.
Thus I would propose that we legalize all drugs; but keep them under varying degrees of regulation based on a logical coherent system, informed by both addictiveness and toxicity.
Thus Heroin would be tightly controlled, requiring a registration with a qualified pharmacist. This would give us an excellent idea of the scale of the problem and a way to target treatment earlier to those most in need. We could entice users away from the black market through price competition (a good liberal/ free market solution if I ever there was one) . Black market sale of drugs would still be illegal and the risks involved would (and do) drive prices way above what the state would be able to charge.It may even be possible to put pressure on foreign (criminal) cartels by insisting on 'fair trade' drugs! Not only that but we could levy a 100-200% tax (depending on what drug) on drugs and still undercut the black market. Using the tax money for treatment and education centers; so essentially addicts would pay for their own treatment.
The relief on the average tax payer would be huge. The illegal drug trade would get the biggest kick in the teeth ever. We would have better data about the problem and hopefully prevent many from going to prison.
Whatever you think, people will always take drugs! The law has not nor will it ever be able to stop people. If people are going to take drugs is it not better that it is tightly controlled and regulated - so it would be harder for kids to obtain drugs, so criminals cannot make huge profits, and so the issue of drug use could come out of the shadows and into the light where we can truly see the problem for what it is?
There are many more arguments i could add here. My principal aim in this blog, however, is to show that the case for legalization is a good one, and not informed by loony leftism; but if anything a mixture of liberal philosophy and common sense!
The case I wish to make starts from the following premises:
1.Drugs policy up to now has failed. More people die of drugs (be they alcohol, tobacco or heroin) than ever before. Thus the need for the re-think
2. We need a policy that can deliver treatment to those that need it and put drug dealers out of business once and for all.
Thus I would propose that we legalize all drugs; but keep them under varying degrees of regulation based on a logical coherent system, informed by both addictiveness and toxicity.
Thus Heroin would be tightly controlled, requiring a registration with a qualified pharmacist. This would give us an excellent idea of the scale of the problem and a way to target treatment earlier to those most in need. We could entice users away from the black market through price competition (a good liberal/ free market solution if I ever there was one) . Black market sale of drugs would still be illegal and the risks involved would (and do) drive prices way above what the state would be able to charge.It may even be possible to put pressure on foreign (criminal) cartels by insisting on 'fair trade' drugs! Not only that but we could levy a 100-200% tax (depending on what drug) on drugs and still undercut the black market. Using the tax money for treatment and education centers; so essentially addicts would pay for their own treatment.
The relief on the average tax payer would be huge. The illegal drug trade would get the biggest kick in the teeth ever. We would have better data about the problem and hopefully prevent many from going to prison.
Whatever you think, people will always take drugs! The law has not nor will it ever be able to stop people. If people are going to take drugs is it not better that it is tightly controlled and regulated - so it would be harder for kids to obtain drugs, so criminals cannot make huge profits, and so the issue of drug use could come out of the shadows and into the light where we can truly see the problem for what it is?
There are many more arguments i could add here. My principal aim in this blog, however, is to show that the case for legalization is a good one, and not informed by loony leftism; but if anything a mixture of liberal philosophy and common sense!
Total Comments 9
Comments
| | Actually, I agree - though I doubt it will come to pass. The fact that making it legal would reduce the numbers of people using, reduce the strength of certain drugs (particularly cannabis) and make the streets safer wouldn't be a winning argument for some: and they really don't see that tobacco and alcohol are legalised drugs. (People see want they want to see I suppose!) blessings |
Posted 11-08-2008 at 11:29 PM by LornaDoone38 |
| | Legalise drugs i agree but also legalise gun ownership again that way when a drug addled criminal attackes me in the street or in my home i can shoot him in the lower spine(so as not to kill him but prevent any further violent drug addled crime by this particular savage)! |
Posted 12-08-2008 at 04:50 AM by pauli007001 |
| | Incentives for pharmeceutical companies!It is possible that new drugs with narcotic side-effects could be made legally to replace more unpredictable natural drugs from unreliable sources such as heroine and opium. These new drugs would ideally be non-addictive and have no damaging side long term effects. Legalising and commercialising drugs would help to fund the pharmaceutical companies in development of these new drugs. |
Posted 15-08-2008 at 07:46 PM by Winston |
| | Do these companies really need MORE funding? I thought they did ok as it was |
Posted 15-08-2008 at 07:52 PM by Marxist Nutter |
| | P.S I live near a town centre and I have been attacked many times in my life while going about minding my own business, and never once has it been by drug crazed criminals, but always by a local beer heroes tanked up on booze and ready to punch some innocent bystanders head in. Booze is a disgusting dirty drug which turns people into idiots. |
Posted 15-08-2008 at 07:53 PM by Winston |
| | P.S I live near a town centre and I have been attacked many times in my life while going about minding my own business, and never once has it been by drug crazed criminals, but always by a local beer heroes tanked up on booze and ready to punch some innocent bystanders head in. Booze is a disgusting dirty drug which turns people into idiots. |
Posted 15-08-2008 at 07:53 PM by Winston |
| | Without a market for narcotic drugs the drugs companies will have no reason to research new drug. The important point is that the research is financially viable and thus can proceed. |
Posted 15-08-2008 at 07:55 PM by Winston |
| | The problem is M.N. being an old hand I believe Drug taking alters personality and damages the brain making that person a drain on society. Even if you tried to control the the sale and consumption legally, a black market would would step in to satisfy the excess demand. Once inhaled or injected the desire for more increases and it's this fact that is the cause of a large amount of crime amoung poorer communities. |
Posted 15-10-2008 at 10:42 AM by Expounder |
| | Exp. I don't see how you get from brain alteration to a drain on society. The simple fact is most people that use drugs maintain full employment and contribute to society as much as a non drug user (on average). The minority that don't get a bad press, but there are also people who don't take drugs who are a drain on society. Drugs don't really have anything to do with how much someone socially contributes. At least there is no mathmatical correlation between drug use and economic contribution to society at least. Social contribution is harder to quantify but still. I think the only place where these things are related is in your mind. At least that is what the evidence would suggest |
Posted 27-10-2008 at 10:58 PM by Marxist Nutter |
Total Trackbacks 0
Trackbacks
Recent Blog Entries by Marxist Nutter
- Why I like conservatives (10-11-2008)
- New Left Manifesto Part 2 (26-09-2008)
- New Left Manifesto part 1 (26-09-2008)
- A very quick history of Post Marxism (06-08-2008)
- Nationalism and Socialism (04-08-2008)



