Nationalism and Socialism
Posted 04-08-2008 at 09:48 PM by Marxist Nutter
This post got pretty much ignored in the Forum and perhaps more properly belongs in a blog:
Many debates I have had on this forum about socialism, tend to drift very quickly to national concerns. Now avoiding the obvious and unhelpful puns we could make about national socialism, I would like to pose a question.
Does socialism mean caring only about the working class in your own country? Surely questions of poverty and fairness apply outside national boundaries. Marx was unquestionably an internationalist. 'Working men of all countries unite....'
There is a bigger point here tho. The world we live in is increasingly globalised and the working class of any or every country are at the whim of international forces. I think any true socialism for the 21st century needs to follow the long tradition of international Marxism. For me nationalism is an outmoded way of thinking. Netherless it is still very strong on this forum (not just the BNP either). There is nothing wrong with loving the people of your country, of course. I think British people are on the whole moderate and tolerant of difference. Britain is still a great place live compared with many countries I have visited. This is not the same however as loving your country as a historical actor. To love one's country in this way is to privilege a certain contingent formation - the nation state. Such a bias allows us to somewhat ignore the plight of much of humanity and say 'our hospitals and schools are more important', than world poverty. There is nothing wrong with thinking this, per se. However as a Marxist I think every life is of equal value regardless of nationality . Nationalist thinking can often lead to racism and bias against asylum seekers, who for example are closer to the old notion of proletarians, than many working class British people. More to the point however, is that in a globalised economy, a world facing environmental challenges and international terrorism, nationalist thinking simply does not cut the mustard. We cannot face this new globalised world whilst focusing entirely on national concerns. For a start it will do this country and its working classes no favours. The old notions of the bourgeois and working classes do not fit this world anymore. What Marxists need to do, in my view, is challenge poverty and suffering, no matter where in the world it occurs.
Now awaiting an onslaught of people calling me a traitor to my nation...
Many debates I have had on this forum about socialism, tend to drift very quickly to national concerns. Now avoiding the obvious and unhelpful puns we could make about national socialism, I would like to pose a question.
Does socialism mean caring only about the working class in your own country? Surely questions of poverty and fairness apply outside national boundaries. Marx was unquestionably an internationalist. 'Working men of all countries unite....'
There is a bigger point here tho. The world we live in is increasingly globalised and the working class of any or every country are at the whim of international forces. I think any true socialism for the 21st century needs to follow the long tradition of international Marxism. For me nationalism is an outmoded way of thinking. Netherless it is still very strong on this forum (not just the BNP either). There is nothing wrong with loving the people of your country, of course. I think British people are on the whole moderate and tolerant of difference. Britain is still a great place live compared with many countries I have visited. This is not the same however as loving your country as a historical actor. To love one's country in this way is to privilege a certain contingent formation - the nation state. Such a bias allows us to somewhat ignore the plight of much of humanity and say 'our hospitals and schools are more important', than world poverty. There is nothing wrong with thinking this, per se. However as a Marxist I think every life is of equal value regardless of nationality . Nationalist thinking can often lead to racism and bias against asylum seekers, who for example are closer to the old notion of proletarians, than many working class British people. More to the point however, is that in a globalised economy, a world facing environmental challenges and international terrorism, nationalist thinking simply does not cut the mustard. We cannot face this new globalised world whilst focusing entirely on national concerns. For a start it will do this country and its working classes no favours. The old notions of the bourgeois and working classes do not fit this world anymore. What Marxists need to do, in my view, is challenge poverty and suffering, no matter where in the world it occurs.
Now awaiting an onslaught of people calling me a traitor to my nation...
Total Comments 7
Comments
| | TRAITOR! FOOL! HARBINGER OF DEATH! Not really... I agree with you 100%, again (as with drugs blog). Although, as witht he first, too radical. Which is what's annoying, I guess. Youc an push for these changes but inevitably you'll have to meet thjose who oppose it halfway, then ti won't be anywehre near as effective, may fail, and then people will call for changes pulling the developments in the opposite direction. Square one. |
Posted 05-08-2008 at 12:50 AM by revilopoli |
| | Cheers Revliopoli. You may be right. But I still think democracy is the key. It may be flawed and mean compromise; but the most important thing is that we don't sit back content with our democracy and always stay vigilant against those that would destroy it but at the same time strive to deepen and improve it. Western democracies are not good enough! We need global, radical and plural democarcy, at the very least. Bit that would mean more compromise and less effective, policy, you could argue.. Thee are always trade offs. If I had all the answers I would write a book! |
Posted 05-08-2008 at 01:44 AM by Marxist Nutter |
| | Then lead a coup with your many fans. There's the solution. |
Posted 05-08-2008 at 03:48 PM by revilopoli |
| | I think there are more against me than for me. I'd lose! |
Posted 05-08-2008 at 04:01 PM by Marxist Nutter |
| | And we that oppose you possess most of the really cool weaponry. Tantal |
Posted 06-08-2008 at 05:49 AM by Tantal |
| | Hitler was also a socialist,as was stalin,whuch socialist philosophy do you recommend? |
Posted 12-08-2008 at 04:54 AM by pauli007001 |
| | Thanks for the query Pauli, please refer to blog 'A very quick history of Post-Marxism'. I will quickly say that I a would recommend a deepening of democracy. Democracy can be traced back in the socialist tradition at least as far back as Marx himself. I would say that I am anti free market (tho not in all cases) but pro freedom of expression (which is lacking from many regimes that call themselves socialist/communist). I simply do not agree that Hitler was a socialist except INO; but I don't think I will ever be able to make you see reason on this point. |
Posted 12-08-2008 at 02:01 PM by Marxist Nutter |
Total Trackbacks 0
Trackbacks
Recent Blog Entries by Marxist Nutter
- Why I like conservatives (10-11-2008)
- New Left Manifesto Part 2 (26-09-2008)
- New Left Manifesto part 1 (26-09-2008)
- A very quick history of Post Marxism (06-08-2008)
- Nationalism and Socialism (04-08-2008)



