THE OTHER LOT, SAY'S, OUR PSEUDO ILLEGAL DIRT ST. DYNASTY, DID IT ALL WRONG: WE ARE NOW GOING TO SPEND BILLIONS OF YOUR MONEY DOING IT OUR WAY, HOW ELSE CAN WE PAY OFF OUR 'FRIENDS' EXCEPT BY PALMING OUT TO THEM LOTS OF LOVELY JUICY OVERPRICED CONTRACT WORK. AND, THERE IS SO MUCH LOOT ABOUT, WITH LOTS MORE TO COME, AS SOON AS WE'VE WORKED OUT HOW WERE GOING TO STUFF AN UNGRATEFUL ELECTORATE. A NEW BUDGET, THAT WE WILL KEEP US' AND OURS, IN CLOVER FOR YEARS. JUST IN CASE THIER ARE ANY WARBLES ABOUT THIS DICTATORSHIP FROM THE 'BARMY ARMY', A NEW 'BULL' IS NOW PUBLISHED WHICH NEGATES THEIR OBJECTIONS. EVEN IF THEY LEAVE OUR DICTORSHIP ALLIANCE IT WILL NOT AFFECT OUR DICTATORSHIP.
NO DOUBT if Nick Clegg lost his job as leader of the Liberal Democratic Party there would be a great future for him modelling the products on the front of knitting patterns. He has that sort of look, don’t you think? In just the same sort of way Little David Cameron could make a living, of sorts, as a fishmonger - I can just see his cherubic little face beneath a boater hat handing over a “really nice portion of haddock madam”, as he deftly wrapped his wares in a sheet of recycled newspaper. None of our politicians has to do their jobs. Most of them could get proper ones if they tried a bit, they might be amazed at what they could turn their hands to. Take that Theresa May, well I certainly would rather not, don’t you think that she is blossoming nicely into the archetypal pub ...
Originally Posted by theredbladder EVERYTHING is looking absolutely rosy in the all-new and brightly shining Conservative-Liberal coalition. Well at this early stage it would, wouldn’t it? But judging from the dire warnings coming from everyone involved from the Prime Minister down to the man who sweeps out the Liberal Hall in Yeovil they are going to take the type of budgetary decisions that will make them as popular as a couple of cheap tarts in the royal enclosure at Ascot. Taxes will rise, other things will have new taxes slapped on them and they might even be forced into the novel notion of placing a tax on taxes. None of this will play well with the voting public. No more will the types of cuts to public services that we are promised will as swinging as Herod’s slaughter of the first born. Just a few ...
Originally Posted by Expounder With Cameron's constitutional change for getting rid of an unpopular government from 51% to 55% majority he doesn't need the Lib Dems any more they were just window dressing to get him into No10. The total opposition including the Lib Dems can only muster 53%. We have a five year Tory dictatorship to do as they please. The naive Lib Dems hungry for the trappings of power plus the grace and favour plush flats and ministerial cars can play at being cabinet ministers to satisfy their own personal egos, but truth be known they are no longer needed by Cameron to survive in No10. He played them for suckers and they fell for it. All of the promises he made can be reneged on and in spite of all protestations can remain in office
Originally Posted by Expounder We are in for a five year Tory dictatorship if the Tories end up with a minority government and the Lib Dems pull out this farce of a coalition. You're so full of pontificating about the democtatic process don't you think this is the sort of stoke that any cheap political spiv would pull The Tories have cynically overturned over two hundred years of parliamentary history practice to hold on to office if defeated by a simple majority vote. We know now, and so do the gullible Lib Dems,[who are really no longer needed except for window dressing] why they were so readily accepted into the Tory lair. It was to enable Cameron to cobble his ad hoc cabinet together to give this outrageous decision a veneer of legitimacy. He doesn't need the Lib Dems any more, job done and dusted. ...
Blog Categories
Archive
Recent Comments
