How disturbing...
What the hell is wrong with people these days!

There's no deterrent. We need a NO BS Policy on crime!

Originally Posted by Trevortt

We need a NO BS Policy on crime!

What does that mean?

Originally Posted by Ronald Reagan

What does that mean?

A law that makes people scared of doing such monstrosity, and 50 years minimum in prison, you fund your own stay, if you can't, you get ***** flour, tap water and yeast.

If you don't wana suffer in prison, don't make law abidding people suffer.

Originally Posted by newspresenter

A law that makes people scared of doing such monstrosity, and 50 years minimum in prison, you fund your own stay, if you can't, you get ***** flour, tap water and yeast.

If you don't wana suffer in prison, don't make law abidding people suffer.

That's is a great idea! Make them pay for themselves! I never thought of that before.

Originally Posted by newspresenter

THE DAUGHTER of a pensioner who was subjected to a horrific sex attack is urging people to help police catch him.

The 73-year-old great-grandmother was walking along a canal towpath when a man followed her home.

He got talking to her and then offered to help her with her keys to open the front door. But the attacker then forced his way into the house before sexually assaulting her.

She was so distraught that she was unable to dial 999 and had to wait until her carer arrived.

The man returned to her home in Openshaw two weeks later, but she recognised him through the spy-hole on her door and pressed her panic alarm.

Her ordeal began after the woman had walked home along the towpath off Ashton Old Road at about 5pm on June 4. He befriended her and then followed her home.

Detectives have now issued an e-fit of the attacker.

It is thought the same man returned to her home at about 5pm on June 19.

The woman's daughter said: "She has been absolutely traumatised by what has happened. She's 73 and she's vulnerable. My mum is the victim but this has affected our whole family.

"This man is extremely dangerous and it's important that people help the police to catch him before he does something like this again."

Police have launched an appeal for witnesses.

Det Insp Mark Hussey, from Grey Mare Lane CID, said: "This poor woman had already been through a horrendous ordeal when a man fitting the same description came to her door on Friday.

"Thankfully, she had the presence of mind to act quickly and raise the alarm. It must have brought back some horrendous memories for her."

He added: "I find it very disturbing that this man may have come back to the victim's house. He obviously recognises the woman as a vulnerable person and is preying on that fact.

"While incidents like this are rare, we ask people to be vigilant and walk in groups where possible. The man befriended the victim at a busy time of day so it is likely that people passed or saw them as they walked, if you did please contact me."

The attacker was Asian, middle aged and slim. He had short, dark hair that was neatly brushed.

Anyone with information should call Grey Mare Lane CID on 0161 856 3240 or Crimestoppers, anonymously, on 0800 555111.
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/1122149_oap_suffers_sex_attack?rss=yes

How...what the...when....what...er....unreal, britain 2009.

I'm always looking for new reasons to dislike Asians, thanks

Why is it relevant that he is Asian, newspresenter? YOU are trying to label ME a racist in the Big Brother thread.

On funding your own prison stay, don't be an idiot. All that would do is make prison better for rich people.

Originally Posted by DougieG

On funding your own prison stay, don't be an idiot. All that would do is make prison better for rich people.

Did i say they could buy what they liked? Flour, water and yeast, a basic matress pillow blankets, prison uniform etc, thats all they should be allowed to buy.

Could be a vote winner.

What is the relevence of stating that the attacker is Asian? What nationality he is is irrelevent.

Relevent: A man raped a woman.

Irrevelent: Asian rapes a woman.

hey Newspresenter. Any chance you would have privileged us with this crime report if it had been committed by a white person?
Its just that it seems to me that your main goal in life is to report every crime by an non-white.
I think that if someone on the site started doing the same with crime by whites, and trying to imply something about them, you might be a little ticked off.

I'm just worried this man will turn out to be a BNP member with a suntan.

Originally Posted by Citizen Smith

hey Newspresenter. Any chance you would have privileged us with this crime report if it had been committed by a white person?
Its just that it seems to me that your main goal in life is to report every crime by an non-white.
I think that if someone on the site started doing the same with crime by whites, and trying to imply something about them, you might be a little ticked off.

Ive gota keep the news presenters union in order which i do on several forums.
I wouldn't mind people doing the opposite to me, infact i welcome it, it just confirms even more that the multicultural experiment is a failier.

Originally Posted by newspresenter

Ive gota keep the news presenters union in order which i do on several forums.
I wouldn't mind people doing the opposite to me, infact i welcome it, it just confirms even more that the multicultural experiment is a failier.

You know what, I started writing an enormously long reply to to, explaning why you can be safely categorised as a racist, a bigot and a xenophobe, but I decided not to for the pure fact that logic and reason, let alone evidence, play no part in forming your opinions. All I would be doing is providing the logical and reasonable basis for what pretty much everyone else believes of you.

Let’s not pretend. The attacker being Asian will be seen by many as “relevant”.

Originally Posted by DougieG

You know[/SIZE] what, I started writing an enormously long reply to to, explaning why you can be safely categorised as a racist, a bigot and a xenophobe, but I decided not to for the pure fact that logic and reason, let alone evidence, play no part in forming your opinions. All I would be doing is providing the logical and reasonable basis for what pretty much everyone else believes of you.

Whats a racist & xenophobe? How do you equate the dictionary definition of those words to what ive said anywhere on this forum?

Was attacking me, your best form of defending yourself?

Type that enormously long reply, and after i reply, lets do a poll to see who won the argument. Im not scared of you. You can try bullying me all you want, delete posts, lock threads, all you do is make me and free speech a martyr.



Why are some people scared to speak, bonkers.

Originally Posted by newspresenter

Why are some people scared to speak, bonkers.

Most people talk common sense though Newspresenter!

Before this goes any further, it might be appropriate to point out section 2.11.1.1. of the Forum Rules to you - "Abuse towards moderators will not be tolerated and may result in you being banned".

Originally Posted by Midas

Most people talk common sense though Newspresenter!

Before this goes any further, it might be appropriate to point out section 2.11.1.1. of the Forum Rules to you - "Abuse towards moderators will not be tolerated and may result in you being banned".

Whats the definition of common sense though Midas, its never been set in human stone so to speak, your version is another's nonsense, another's is your nonsense.

Abuse, yet again, no definition. I don't wana break this websites rules, i'd rather go on one of the other 10 forums i post on than speak freely and break your rules, but what are they, how will i know what your version of abuse is?
Theres what we call obvious, but i havn't done any of that, so why point out section 2.1.1.1.1.1.

Wouldn't it make much more sense, that if a poster is openly abusing (admits to it/doing the absolute obvious), you ban them, but if you're not sure, you ask, then if they say they had no intention to abuse, you accept it and move on in an adult fashion?

Just banning people because you think they were abusing, is a 1984 nightmare.

I havn't intentionally tried to offend or abuse, but that doesn't mean i havn't broke your rules, how daft is that.

On the David Icke forum, you can swear to your hearts content, but if you talk about a moderator, you get a warning/suspension, daft.

If i had a forum, i would allow anyone to say whatever they like so long as they didn't break the law, free speech.

Originally Posted by My Winter Storm

What is the relevence of stating that the attacker is Asian? What nationality he is is irrelevent.
.

By knowing he's ethnicity it narrows down the suspects.

Originally Posted by SussexWithLove

By knowing he's ethnicity it narrows down the suspects.

You are assuming then that NP's reasoning behind this post is to spread the word about the attacker, so that us internet peeps will hunt down a suspect?

Bit strange.

Originally Posted by Dr The Evidence

You are assuming then that NP's reasoning behind this post is to spread the word about the attacker, so that us internet peeps will hunt down a suspect?

Bit strange.

There is a full description of him and a contact crimestoppers number, why leave out detail? You never know who’s reading.

(Its not my fault the majority of people are white. Maybe we should all get skin implants to give this guy more of a chance.)

I dont see what the fuss is all about. Id be surprised if someone didn’t describe me as white. In fact im jealous, at least this guy has an indentity.

Originally Posted by DougieG

You know[/SIZE] what, I started writing an enormously long reply to to, explaning why you can be safely categorised as a racist, a bigot and a xenophobe, but I decided not to for the pure fact that logic and reason, let alone evidence, play no part in forming your opinions. All I would be doing is providing the logical and reasonable basis for what pretty much everyone else believes of you.

You in the past have explained how i am persistently racist and homophobic because i disagreed with you on the issue of mandatory organ donation/opt out not in/assumed consent, is my opinion on that matter still racist?Race was not even a factor in the debate was it?
Ah well here i am believing that people should be free from government interference in their lives and to you that makes me a persistently racist and homophobic person, right?

Yup very logical and reasonable!!

Originally Posted by pauli007001

You in the past have explained how i am persistently racist and homophobic because i disagreed with you on the issue of mandatory organ donation/opt out not in/assumed consent, is my opinion on that matter still racist?Race was not even a factor in the debate was it?
Ah well here i am believing that people should be free from government interference in their lives and to you that makes me a persistently racist and homophobic person, right?

Yup very logical and reasonable!!

Pauli, you know very well that this debate has a) nothing to do with what you are saying at the moment and b) nothing to do with freedom from government interference. This debate is now focusing around the fact that Newspresenter appears to believe that an assault by an asian is different from and assault by a white person. Do you think that those are two particularly different things? I advise you not to pursue this, as last time you took it too far and were banned (not by me, I might add).

Also, you are twisting the circumstances. You actually stated in that debate that you might not want to receive a heart from a black person, which was what I labelled as racist, and you decided to begin to change the meaning of your words. If you want, we will look the thread up, and I will explain to you why my comments were justified at the time, otherwise, drop it.

Originally Posted by DougieG

This debate is now focusing around the fact that Newspresenter appears to believe that an assault by an asian is different from and assault by a white person.

So now its part of the rules here to tell lies and abuse others this way?

Sounds like grandma could use a nice .38 snubbie. Just sayin'.

Originally Posted by Tantal

Sounds like grandma could use a nice .38 snubbie. Just sayin'.

FN ps90 would be better and more accurate!!!

Originally Posted by newspresenter

So now its part of the rules here to tell lies and abuse others this way?

No, that was what the debate was focusing upon. The fact that, instead of saying that a man had committed the crime, you had said an 'asian' committed a crime.

Originally Posted by DougieG

No, that was what the debate was focusing upon. The fact that, instead of saying that a man had committed the crime, you had said an 'asian' committed a crime.

But thats not the same as, "Newspresenter appears to believe that an assault by an asian is different from and assault by a white person"

Is it? Why lie? And an asian man did do it, its FACT, the truth, real, not false, not a a lie. Im not your normal newspresenter type you know

Originally Posted by newspresenter

But thats not the same as, "Newspresenter appears to believe that an assault by an asian is different from and assault by a white person"

Is it? Why lie? And an asian man did do it, its FACT, the truth, real, not false, not a a lie. Im not your normal newspresenter type you know

You tell me if it was different? If I reported the attack, I would have said that a man sexually assaulted the woman, I don't see how his race is relevant. Unless you believe that race is a defining factor in a person (i.e., saying that people of different races have significantly different importances/traits) then why mention it, at least in the title?

Originally Posted by pauli007001

FN ps90 would be better and more accurate!!!

I disagree- a xfe.rfo.288.99/9093 would be more suitable in my opinion.

Originally Posted by DougieG

Pauli, you know very well that this debate has a) nothing to do with what you are saying at the moment and b) nothing to do with freedom from government interference. This debate is now focusing around the fact that Newspresenter appears to believe that an assault by an asian is different from and assault by a white person. Do you think that those are two particularly different things? I advise you not to pursue this, as last time you took it too far and were banned (not by me, I might add).

Also, you are twisting the circumstances. You actually stated in that debate that you might not want to receive a heart from a black person, which was what I labelled as racist, and you decided to begin to change the meaning of your words. If you want, we will look the thread up, and I will explain to you why my comments were justified at the time, otherwise, drop it.

I DID NOT state any such thing in debate, do please look up the thread and do explain why your comments were justified.

I will continue as requested to discuss thin only via PM but you made the allegation on the open forum that i said such a thing, i deserve the right to deny it completely.I anticipate your proof or your apology with baited breath, either will be acceptable.Ta very much!!!!

Originally Posted by DougieG

You tell me if it was different? If I reported the attack, I would have said that a man sexually assaulted the woman, I don't see how his race is relevant. Unless you believe that race is a defining factor in a person (i.e., saying that people of different races have significantly different importances/traits) then why mention it, at least in the title?

what are you onabout?

Originally Posted by newspresenter

what are you onabout?

Hah. You are challenged in your racism and feign non-understanding. Tell me why it is relevant that the criminal was asian.

Originally Posted by My Winter Storm

What is the relevence of stating that the attacker is Asian? What nationality he is is irrelevent.

Relevent: A man raped a woman.

Irrevelent: Asian rapes a woman.

Of course it is relevant. Different people from different cultures are more likely to commit different crimes. Nigerians for example are all con men, the Scotts get drunk and fight, West Indian men mug people and Asian blokes rape old ladies.

Originally Posted by CAGAN

Of course it is relevant. Different people from different cultures are more likely to commit different crimes. Nigerians for example are all con men, the Scotts get drunk and fight, West Indian men mug people and Asian blokes rape old ladies.

Surely we could come up with some award for this post?

Originally Posted by Dr The Evidence

Surely we could come up with some award for this post?

Racist as it may be, it wouldn't be a stereotype if there weren't just a hint of truth to it.

Originally Posted by DougieG

Hah. You are challenged in your racism and feign non-understanding. Tell me why it is relevant that the criminal was asian.

you've been told, now be told. And don't forget to take the trash out

Originally Posted by CAGAN

Of course it is relevant. Different people from different cultures are more likely to commit different crimes. Nigerians for example are all con men, the Scotts get drunk and fight, West Indian men mug people and Asian blokes rape old ladies.

Thats quite true in an un pc world. Take the asian bit, they're famous for raping white girls via drugs and booze, getting them pregnant and forcing them both to conform to islam.

EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEven on my way home from work tonight, 3 asian men in a car were handing out bottles of vodka to white girls 300 yards from where i live, and i don't live in a asian area. Whats happening is these asian lads are getting very confident with this kind of thing and are patrolling non asian areas. They wont last long trying it on a polish girl, theres some very big polish men round here, BOOM!