There'll be nowhere to run from the new world government

**newspresenter** · 21-12-2009, 10:26 PM

"2009 was the year in which "global" swept the rest of the political lexicon into obscurity. There were "global crises" and "global challenges", the only possible resolution to which lay in "global solutions" necessitating "global agreements". Gordon Brown actually suggested something called a "global alliance" in response to climate change. (Would this be an alliance against the Axis of Extra-Terrestrials?).

it also had political ramifications that were scarcely examined by those who bandied it about with such ponderous self-importance. The mere utterance of it was assumed to sweep away any consideration of what was once assumed to be the most basic principle of modern democracy: that elected national governments are responsible to their own people – that the right to govern derives from the consent of the electorate."
There'll be nowhere to run from the new world government - Telegraph

Especially interesting when a normally newspaper cartel sponsorer breeds these kind of articles. Pressure to do so from a growing concerned public? And/or personal opinion of events? If latter, what documentaries and/or non mainstream professors of life was reporter Jane Daley listening to?, Alex Jones, David Icke? What brick wall did she blow up that forced the Telepgraph editor to choose her article over something else? hmm

Citizen Smith · 21-12-2009, 10:34 PM

Scary stuff newspresenter, thanks for bringing this to out attention- you can see by the number of responses how highly your opinions are regarded.

**Tantal** · 21-12-2009, 10:50 PM

Just aim 15-inches below the baby blue helmets gentlemen.

**fubar** · 21-12-2009, 10:51 PM

the sh** will hit the fan some time soon I'm sure of that and it looks like the cat is definitely out the bag hope it starts here in England possibly christmas eve .

**uncon** · 21-12-2009, 11:05 PM

Originally Posted by fubar

the sh** will hit the fan some time soon I'm sure of that and it looks like the cat is definitely out the bag hope it starts here in England possibly christmas eve .

In what sense?

**fubar** · 21-12-2009, 11:18 PM

Originally Posted by uncon

In what sense?

have a feeling in my waters LOL

**Don** · 21-12-2009, 11:23 PM

Originally Posted by fubar

the sh** will hit the fan some time soon I'm sure of that and it looks like the cat is definitely out the bag hope it starts here in England possibly christmas eve.

Originally Posted by uncon

In what sense?

Possibly in the sense of putting an end to "cliches"

**Don** · 21-12-2009, 11:26 PM

Originally Posted by Tantal

Just aim 15-inches below the baby blue helmets gentlemen.

Which presumes being allowed to have something with which to aim

**coalition** · 21-12-2009, 11:31 PM

Originally Posted by newspresenter

"2009 was the year in which "global" swept the rest of the political lexicon into obscurity. There were "global crises" and "global challenges", the only possible resolution to which lay in "global solutions" necessitating "global agreements". Gordon Brown actually suggested something called a "global alliance" in response to climate change. (Would this be an alliance against the Axis of Extra-Terrestrials?).

it also had political ramifications that were scarcely examined by those who bandied it about with such ponderous self-importance. The mere utterance of it was assumed to sweep away any consideration of what was once assumed to be the most basic principle of modern democracy: that elected national governments are responsible to their own people – that the right to govern derives from the consent of the electorate."
There'll be nowhere to run from the new world government - Telegraph

Especially interesting when a normally newspaper cartel sponsorer breeds these kind of articles. Pressure to do so from a growing concerned public? And/or personal opinion of events? If latter, what documentaries and/or non mainstream professors of life was reporter Jane Daley listening to?, Alex Jones, David Icke? What brick wall did she blow up that forced the Telepgraph editor to choose her article over something else? hmm

Contrary to percieved thought, Editors do not care about the Public or thier ridiculous opinions, any more than Politicians do, with a wide remit they follow the owners signposts.

**fubar** · 21-12-2009, 11:32 PM

Originally Posted by Don

Originally Posted by fubar

the sh** will hit the fan some time soon I'm sure of that and it looks like the cat is definitely out the bag hope it starts here in England possibly christmas eve.

Possibly in the sense of putting an end to "cliches"

not meant to be original don i was trying to be ironic LOL

**fubar** · 21-12-2009, 11:33 PM

Originally Posted by coalition

Contrary to percieved thought, Editors do not care about the Public or thier ridiculous opinions, any more than Politicians do, with a wide remit they follow the owners signposts.

tell us something we didn't know already

**Greg Lance-Watkins** · 22-12-2009, 01:10 AM

Originally Posted by coalition

Contrary to percieved thought, Editors do not care about the Public or thier ridiculous opinions, any more than Politicians do, with a wide remit they follow the owners signposts.

Hi,

I believe you have overlooked the major factor in the MSM which is that without advertising they go bust!

I understand that the largest single advertiser in these United Kingdoms is HM Government to which can be added the huge EU budget for propaganda and indoctrination - without these two sources of income it is unlikely any of the MSM would survive.

If you include share holders as owners then you are clearly right.

Regards,
Greg L-W.