This is a discussion on Men out-spend women on beauty products within the Coffee Room forums, part of the The House of Commons category; Young men are now spending more on looking good than women, according to a UK survey. From across the UK, ...
Young men are now spending more on looking good than women, according to a UK survey.
From across the UK, 3000 18- to 35-year-olds were questioned about their health, fitness and beauty regimes, revealing a narrowing in the gender divide....
Men out-spend women on beauty products
Where have all the real men gone? all this metrosexual nonsense is killing the british male
Vote BNP
This is the actual survey - http://www.multipoweruk.com/the-news...ood-gender.pdf - but what I can't find is the breakdown of the 3,000 people surveyed and whether they were chosen at random or were customers of the company who conducted the survey, in which case they'd already be predisposed to taking more care of themselves than average. I have to admit to being somewhat dubious about the numbers involved in such a poll; 3,000 seems a very low number to base such conclusions on.
"High taxes don't redistribute wealth; they redistribute taxpayers" -- Arthur Laffer
If they are counting Health and fitness in these figures then that’s possible, Gym memberships and equipment etc... As for "beauty products" I find that rather unlikely unless there are a lot more fags in this country than previously thought.
They joy of statistics is that you can make them show pretty much anything you like depending on how you interperate them.
I'm in my 30's, live like I'm still in my 20's and gripe like I'm in my 60's!
I drive, a 2.2 Type S GT Civic to work and Stage 1 V8 landrover at the weekends to annoy the hippies.
Precisely! I remember going to a lecture on polls and statistical analysis several years ago, and although many of the details haven't stayed with me, I do recall the comment that the vast majority of polls conducted give either misleading or biased results depending on whether the precise wording of the questions was not completely neutral or was somehow loaded - sometimes on purpose to give skewed results to try to gain an advantage in some commercial, economic or political arena, other times inadvertently by people inexperienced at setting such questions. Far too many polls can also be misleading because either not enough people have completed them or the audience addressed by the poll hasn't been spread right across the spectrum of social and economic indicators, like those in many special interest magazines. A wonderful example of the latter two are those poll results you often see on TV adverts for women's cosmetics - "72% of 103 people agreed" - wow, that must make it the most wonderful product ever!
I do very much suspect, as you point out, that this particular poll fits into one or other of the misleading results categories!
"High taxes don't redistribute wealth; they redistribute taxpayers" -- Arthur Laffer
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks