It occurs to us that if David Cameron, Tory Party Leader and claimed supporter of the communist infested UAF gang, needs a second-home in his Witney constituency then he and/or the Tory Party, should pay for it – not the taxpayer! It was, after all, Cameron’s decision to stand for election in that constituency – he must have known that commuting was involved between there and The House - so why should the taxpayer be penalised? Furthermore why, we ask, should Cameron not be obliged to repay the huge amount of taxpayers’ money spent on his second-home – rather than, as matters currently stand, being allowed to retain every penny of profit should he sell that property?

The British National Party News | Allowancesgate: Why should we have to pay towards Cameron’s second-home?