another example of behaviour placement

I think conspirists behaviour is pretty plain for everyone to see without any behaviour placements. It was also pretty plain to see that government were abusing their expense privileges, we just didn't know the extent of it. It is equally observable that many people in power abuse that power for their own gain, i don't think that is a conspiracy just common sense. We know when we put people in power that they are going to abuse it to a certain extent, the very nature of those who are attracted to positions of power makes it so. We just hope that if things go to far the reigns can be drawn in.

Thankyou , thats correct , I would like to add though that you need a vigalent public and a public that is not under the spell of corrupt media and that is getting accurate information , just yesterday there was another proven case of government bodys releasing figures at a time to suit them. Is this a conspiracy.
Budd insists that OBR

I assume by conspirisists you mean the people involved in these conspiracys , as this is what it means , I hope you havent made a mistake in refering to conspiracy theorists a more wholesome brand of people.

If a Conspiracist was depicted here who was against the Obama Administration, both the media
and the government would aim to criticize and stereotype that being as something not.


I don't necessarily believe all Conspirators sre the same. They depict many aspects, tones, and
their own behaviorial style. Conspiracy Theories are not all the same and neither beliefs. People
picture a Conspiracy Theorist as one person full of their own opinionated characteristics.


There are Conspiracy Theories I do not believe in as others and I'm hardly one at all. I only aim my
theories against our current government and our own current media. For the 'conspiracy theories'
of events such as 9/11, Pearl Harbor, Warren Commision, and 1993 Bombing, I do not believe in. Only
the realizations of these cases.


Theorists I come to say are not the same. They represent different qualities and ones we may
have never imagined of. Anyone can be a theorist and the reasoning here is theorists are anything.
People often misjudge things and this is one of them.

Conspiracy Theories calling someone a conspiracy nut is just the same as using Godwin's law to shut the Discussion or debate down. a very useful tool there are many Conspiracy theoriest out their getting a little bit close to the truth for some peoples likeing and this is just another attempt to shut them down if the powers that be aren't afraid of the and wish to prove them right thay should use the court to shut them up,but why is if thay never do such a thing would you like to prove your Innocent say with the likes of, say 9/11 ,7/7 but the the government would have to defend it's self and i don't see that happening any time soon do you.

looks like government propaganda to me. Is this quote sums it up for me from the comments
this is really crappy science. First of all, the test measured people's sense of trust and level of societal "alienation". Who gets to decide what is a reasonable sense of trust in society and who gets to determine the reason other's may feel alienated by society? Some people feel alienated from society because they have above average IQs, does that mean their opinions on scandals is invalid? Besides the govts account of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory, does that make it invalid?

news in, if you wached the vid and thay mentiooned cell phones, watch the vid and see for yourself so you think you can't be tracked Watch and learn,

YouTube - Cell Phones Can And Are Being Used As Bugs

Thats it , they are blanket stereotyping conspiracy theorists , David Ike for example believes the elites are directed by ancient reptile aliens and believes he has proof of this. I haven't seen his proof myself and cannot completely discount it , but I think it unlikely. I am inclined to believe things about the government , generally if there is a lot of proof . I have lived through the tail end of the NI troubles and have talked to people involved and what they say is reliable , not because I am so upset with the world that between self harming and whacking myself off I go on "kooky" american sites to read the latest poisonous lies about the government.

Ah yes i used the word wrong, sorry. Sorry to say but i do think that some conspiracy theorists are complete nut jobs. Others see the presented evidence and think the idea is a possibility but obviously without more proof it is exactly as it states a theory. I think some theories are plausible but i don't run around like a dog in search of a bone trying to convince others that the United states perpetrated their own 9/11. Is it plausible? Yes i think so, but without more proof we have nothing. Will the truth come out if they did? I doubt it very much. There are somethings we will never know even if they are the truth and a reasonable person knows that. A theorist is like someone with Aspergers syndrome, they just won't let it go no matter how much people tell them to stop telling them about it, it's like some compulsion, and i think that is what makes people just think of them as nut jobs.

I do think we need to be vigilant, but to what end? Hire our own counter intelligence operators?

A conspiracy theorist is someone who sees that 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 = a conspiracy rather than 15.

Thats just it midas , you view all these scandals as separate , but they are all linked. you don't even know about operation gladio YouTube - State Terrorism: Operation Gladio - Belgium how can you expect to have an accurate world view if you don't know history?

The people who think that Conspiracy theorists are crazy are incapable of thinking outside the box. They want to believe that the world is okay, and everything is simply explained. These people make up the majority of the planet and, in my opinion, are the main reason why full disclosure won't happen for a very long time, if ever at all. I guess it's true what they say, ignorance is bliss.