Results 1 to 5 of 5

START: victory or defeat?

This is a discussion on START: victory or defeat? within the Nuclear Proliferation & WMDs forums, part of the Politics on War and Conflicts Forum category; On April, 8 D.Medvedev and B.Obama, Presidents of the Russian Federation and USA, finally signed Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty in ...

  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    73
    Blog Entries
    41
    Liked
    1 times
    Rep Power
    0

    START: victory or defeat?

    On April, 8 D.Medvedev and B.Obama, Presidents of the Russian Federation and USA, finally signed Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty in Prague. The parties to the treaty are committed to limit their operatively deployed nuclear forces to 700 carriers (800 of deployed and non-deployed) and 1550 warheads. The treaty includes a detailed system of definitions, calculation rules as well as foresees setting up of quite a serious system of verification.
    Russian political scientist Dr. Andrey Pavlov believes that Obama needed this treaty more that Medvedev (see his article on START here: START: victory or defeat? | East+West Review Analytics Agency), but what do YOU think about it?

  2. #2
    angelcountry is offline Senior MP

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    471
    Blog Entries
    1
    Liked
    15 times
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: START: victory or defeat?

    How many years to do that ?

    Poverty sometimes causes deceases per every visit and death they faces daily, not only deadly deceases kill like hiv/aids. l.o.l
    Cloud Nine.

  3. #3
    crazylilting is offline Senior MP

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    452
    Liked
    44 times
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: START: victory or defeat?

    Are you saying that the US has 800 carriers?

    http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/ph...28/carrier.jpg

    800 of these things????

    That just seems outrageous, what on earth are they thinking? What enemy is that big that they would possibly need that many nuclear carriers?

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    81
    Blog Entries
    1
    Liked
    4 times
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: START: victory or defeat?

    good good, we're on our way to peace

  5. #5
    Midas's Avatar
    Midas is offline Chancellor

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Rural South Midlands
    Posts
    9,435
    Blog Entries
    18
    Liked
    2489 times
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: START: victory or defeat?

    Quote Originally Posted by crazylilting View Post
    Are you saying that the US has 800 carriers?

    http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/ph...28/carrier.jpg

    800 of these things????

    That just seems outrageous, what on earth are they thinking? What enemy is that big that they would possibly need that many nuclear carriers?
    I think you misunderstood what Russie said. By 'carriers' in the context she was talking about, the reference is to the means of deployment of nuclear warheads, in other words ballistic missiles - not aircraft carriers; the US actually has 11 of those.
    "High taxes don't redistribute wealth; they redistribute taxpayers" -- Arthur Laffer

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. START: victory or defeat?
    By Russie1912 in forum Other Countries
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 15-05-2010, 07:46 AM
  2. Only love can defeat terrorism
    By bookman99 in forum Politics on War and Conflicts Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 16-02-2009, 09:25 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61