Conscious Evolution. - Politics Forum and Political Blog discussing and debating political and social issues.

iconoclast · #1 (**permalink**) 28-09-2007, 03:28 PM

Conscious Evolution.

About 35,000 years ago (in Europe) something occurred to man, and this something was essentially an idea. But not any ordinary idea like: ‘I eat, I ****, I hit with stick’ – this was one of those ideas that allows things to be seen in a new light. It was, in short, the conscious recognition of the artifact-artificer relationship.
The artifact is something that’s been made, and the artificer is the someone who made it. It was demonstrated in the environment of primitive man over and over, until at last he caught on. The sounds or footprints of animals for example, would demonstrate the relationship – and primitive man would have acted on this knowledge instinctually without it being a conscious idea.

(I think this fits with psychological theories on the subconscious content of behavioral motivation. Must check! See if conceptual evolution significant to theories on the development of the brain.)

It may have been nothing more than a footprint in the mud that triggered the realization, but the moment of revelation came when primitive man became aware. He began to see the meanings behind the appearance of things as he began to ask himself:
‘Who made me? Who made the world? and What can I make?’
He began to make art – that’s how we know:

‘…At a German site called Vogelherd someone picked up a piece of ivory 32,000 years ago and carved an exquisite horse in miniature – mouth, flared nostrils, jowls, curved haunches, and swollen belly, all breathlessly realistic. Before Vogelherd, there were no representational horses. Before Vogelherd, all horses were horses.’ (The Neanderthal Enigma – James Shreeve.)

But man made more than horses – he made societies. From hunter-gatherer tribal groups – multi-tribal and social groups were formed, universally employing the great artificer in the sky as an authority for law, as common conception, and as lingua franca. As surely as man made ivory horses it seemed suddenly obvious someone made him and the world he found himself in – just as in making things he found the way forward to better living and better understanding.

In 1233 the Church of Rome established the Papal Court of the Inquisition and punished knowledge as heresy – originally to prevent the return of the works of Aristotle from the Muslim half of the fallen Roman Empire – and this had a number of unforeseen effects upon the subsequent development of knowledge and society.
No-one much likes government and it may be that an elicit and conspiratorial flavor served to promote a distinct rationality in some quarters, but surely great damage was done by not meeting (what turned out to be) valid knowledge squarely and honestly.
That wasn’t possible while maintaining the absolute truth of religious ideas – and by 1632 when Galileo published ‘Inquiry Concerning the Two Chief World Systems’ showing the earth orbits the sun, the Church had been claiming otherwise, as absolute truth, as justification for the great and the terrible for about 400 years.
The immense wealth of the Church enabled it to weather the storm – a storm limited to the educated few who threw off the authority of the Church and took sovereignty unto the Kings of nation states – on the basis of the Divine Right of Kings set down in Holy Scripture. (The only exception to this is England whose King Henry VIII’s marital problems famously had the same political effect in 1533.)
Thus, while the authority of the Church was thrown off just as rational knowledge emerged disproving the absolute/literal truth of the Bible, it was on the basis of Biblical law that the nation state was founded and by religious authority that it was ruled.
Thus, the state inherited a somewhat backward approach to knowledge from the Church – and though prompted by rationality, took up the reigns of religious authority, making it imperative to control information.

As a result, the significance of rational knowledge remains largely unrecognized – but it’s not dissimilar to the unconscious instinctual behaviors of primitive man in the course of the artifact-artificer relationship. Society employs valid knowledge without recognition of its significance – in pursuit of the ends of religiously founded political groups in economic competition. The significance lies with the objective validity of scientific knowledge – now sufficiently coherent to provide a valid worldview. It’s one of those ideas that re-conceptualizes everything, but more significantly, an idea that, socially accepted constitutes evolutionary development.

When we consider what it would mean for man to meet upon the level ground of objective understanding, in knowledge of the validity of science, peace, global government, environmental management and the rational distribution of resources – including knowledge and technology, do not seem impossible. It may be, in face of growing threats from the energy crisis, climate change, over-population and environmental degradation (externalities of the current – less valid rationale of social action) the readiness of this idea is all that stands between us and extinction.

Science is not knowledge to be taken lightly, to be used and cast aside as whimsical notions dictate the direction of human affairs. Direct Insight.

Scientifically valid knowledge is a significant achievement for life on earth and significant to life on earth, but our current social, political and economic systems are not structured to honour valid knowledge. Premised upon ideas that are not demonstrably valid but founded in faith and unconscious universal acceptance – an increasing externalization of validity and reality is achieved by action in their course.
Action is rational to these ideas and therefore seems rational in these terms but is increasingly irrational with respect to reality and valid knowledge. The social, political and economic structure rationalizes action contrary to valid knowledge and reality, and the disparity progresses.
Previous diagnosis of this condition employed a close metaphor in mental illness by describing the progressive loss of touch with reality experienced by the psychotic as reality intrudes upon the fixed, false belief, but it’s unnecessarily clinical. These ideas embody important values – but rushing to the conclusion that we are therefore nutty for good reason is unwarranted.
The temporal direction of knowledge is from less to more through time – however, our social, political and economic structures derive the reality of the moment from pre-existing ideas. It’s unavoidable – but thus absolutely necessary that our bases of analysis are serially revised.
There’s no shame in this, but something sane and human in taking the benefits of an idea and applying them anew, for the temporal direction of knowledge also proceeds from worse to better. Clinging to ideas for the sake of stubbornness or ego, in face of growing disparity with valid knowledge and reality is shameful, inhuman and insane – and has us backing into extinction, unaware of which footfall will not meet solid ground.
Because serial revision is inherent to science a global polity constitutionally bound to valid knowledge would hunger for disproof, as do scientists in intellectual competition, and because there’s a definite prize in science – objective truth, the politics of science will achieve increasingly valid consensus.
Only in the immediate term will it be obvious what’s necessary however – the implementation of hydrogen technology worldwide, population control, the protection of marine and land eco-systems – the big stuff that will enable our species to survive. Beyond that the competition of knowledge at the heart of government will shine the light of intellect into every corner – that everyone can enjoy a valid relation to a social, political and economic reality increasingly valid by design.
Because impartial and valid positions are possible it will not be necessary to choose between two evils, and situations where people are trapped and defeated by the multifaceted irrationalities of their situation will no longer occur. We will not paint ourselves into a corner, but out of one. We’ll not progress backward along the wrong path to extinction, but progress away from extinction in pursuit of truth.

We must take our existence seriously if we are to continue to exist. We know that if we don’t adapt we’ll die – and if we evolve it will be by stepping into the light of truth, naked and unashamed.

Given such a solid foundation to build upon, such an objective guide, such a toolkit and instruction manual as that provided by an honest and unqualified acceptance of scientific method, knowledge, technology and overall picture, human beings capable of awareness, thought and feeling could live, and live well.

The benefits of adopting a rationale for social action that is clear of vision, just in implementation and sane of purpose would be immense and universal – not merely an organism responding to the physical, chemical and biological nature of it’s environment but an awareness coming to terms with itself.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
The evolution of the financing scandal round ruling Labor Party	BobbyDR	Government in general discussion	36	14-01-2008 03:31 PM
Evolution	MR.B4D	Political Topics	49	21-11-2007 03:01 PM
The Next Step in Human Evolution - or how to save the world.	iconoclast	Introduce Yourself	0	08-09-2007 01:52 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)