She was left speechless because Griffin made a connection between David Cameron being a signatory to the UAF policy, and the use of a claw hammer by a thug. This connection is so tenuous as to be laughable.
NP, you have asked this "Why does DC support claw hammer attacking UAF thugs" question a number of times in so many different threads.
Ask David Cameron - he will 100% say that he does not support any violence.
It would be political suicide for anyone to say otherwise.
Why can't you accept that DC does NOT support violence?


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks