Political persecution for professional footballer who votes BNP

[newspresenter]

Leicester City star Wayne Brown forced into grovelling apology over BNP stance | Mail Online

Told he must appologise for voting BNP. Now seriously folks, this is not fair is it, surely even anti-BNPers should recognise that we all deserve the human right to vote how we like.

[Streetwalker]

The bloke is an idiot. Talk about destroying team moral in one easy lesson,what was he thinking letting all the forigners and colonials know he backed the BNP. Yes we have the right to vote for who we like but at times its maybe best to keep it to ourselves. Unless of course he was having a wind up in which case my comment is irrevelant

[ryoden]

Leicester City star Wayne Brown forced into grovelling apology over BNP stance | Mail Online

Told he must appologise for voting BNP. Now seriously folks, this is not fair is it, surely even anti-BNPers should recognise that we all deserve the human right to vote how we like.

Yes it is wrong, but if you vote for any extremist political party regardless of who it is then you will cause anger from other people. The clue is in the word extreme, extremist views tend to evoke extreme reactions in others.

That said i don't understand why he is being forced to apologise, it's a legitimate party who he has every legal right to support but again he was rather stupid admiting that he supported it in front of his team mates several of whom were obviously offended. If he was intending to do that then he should be prepared to take the flak. If i was in his shoes and I was happy to admit who I voted for then I would also be happy enough to say frack you, I will support who I like and you can whistle for an apology, but he obviously lacked the conviction to do so so I dont know why he admitted to it in the first place.

[TheMixer]

Yes it is wrong, but if you vote for any extremist political party regardless of who it is then you will cause anger from other people. The clue is in the word extreme, extremist views tend to evoke extreme reactions in others.

if invading Iraq 'cause they might have fired a few rockets at us isn't extreme i don't know what it!

The thing is with this is it shouldn't even be a political issue. As a liberationist I'm against anti-discrimination legislation so it'd be down to the employer to sort out.Period. Anyone who assaulted him for voting BNP should be charged with assault though.

[newspresenter]

What about those players who vote for Labour extremists? What about when football clubs wine n dine Tory MP's, do the clubs appologise to the fans and players for their extremist political views.

If Wayne Brown was offended by a player voting Labour, should that Labour voter be suspended?

[Barry]

Wayne Brown should have kept his gob shut. End of.

[Opinionated]

Quite! It's a secret ballot for a reason afterall.

[DC]

This is just ridiculous; "I'm sorry because my political view is different to the majority's" I thought Britain was a democracy?

[newspresenter]

Quite! It's a secret ballot for a reason afterall.

Its a secret ballot so that you can avoid people knowing if you don't want them knowing...


Having returned to the dressing room after training, a discussion was taking place between a group of players about the election results. Brown first told a stunned, racially mixed group of players that he had voted for the BNP, and was met with a volley of protest.
Rather than diffusing the situation, the Barking born player launched into an attack on "****ing ragheads and Asians" who he claimed were "killing this country."
The reaction was furious and several players pointed out that, not only were Brown's phrases and views unacceptable, but that he had Asian, black and mixed-race colleagues.

The argument spilled over into a treatment room, before a senior player intervened, told Brown that his views and language were unacceptable.

Seemingly unconcerned at what he had said, Brown went to the canteen to have lunch before, faced with a squad united in their condemnation of him, Brown departed, for what is certain to be the last time.

Leicester manager Nigel Pearson suspended him for the play-off semi finals, and has made clear privately he no longer wishes Brown to be a part of his squad.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1278734/Revealed-What-BNP-supporter-Wayne-Brown-said-enrage-Leicester-team-mates.html?ito=feeds-newsxml#ixzz0o2HSrcsU

[MarkMuses]

This is political persecution when you lose your job for saying "I made this choice on the ballot paper".

It is ridiculous when Police officers, teachers and prison wardens get sacked for membership of a political party listed on the ballot paper. This is the nub of it. If the BNP's views are not' acceptable', if they are 'extreme', then stop pretending we have a true democracy any more, be honest, and ban the British National Party.

[newspresenter]

Exactly Mark. Interestingly, the Mail had reported yesterday (see above), "Rather than diffusing the situation, the Barking born player launched into an attack on "****ing ragheads and Asians" who he claimed were "killing this country."

And now they don't, hmm. Anyone see a liable case?

[MarkMuses]

Exactly Mark. Interestingly, the Mail had reported yesterday (see above), "Rather than diffusing the situation, the Barking born player launched into an attack on "****ing ragheads and Asians" who he claimed were "killing this country."

And now they don't, hmm. Anyone see a liable case?

Perhaps so. I think he should seek redress however he can. By libel against the Mail if he has defence witnesses (prohibitively expensive for most of us), and seek advice if Leicester do drop him for his political views in place of his performance. How rotten has the system we live in become? It begs the question.

It needs people like Brown to exercise it so we can all know where we stand in this thought crime cesspit Britain seems to have sunk to.

[Neo2012]

Stop being a drama queens, how can a party whose sole reason for existence is to discriminate, complain about being discriminated against?

[newspresenter]

Nowt wrong with discrimination, you should know neo, you discriminate against the BNP everyday.

[Neo2012]

Nowt wrong with discrimination, you should know neo, you discriminate against the BNP everyday.

As my signature says, The fascists are always whining about being discriminated against. It's quite simple, if the fascists dont want to be descriminated against, they should stop discriminating against others.

pedophile's, fascists, the courts/society always discriminates against abusers.

[DC]

As my signature says, The fascists are always whining about being discriminated against. It's quite simple, if the fascists dont want to be descriminated against, they should stop discriminating against others.

pedophile's, fascists, the courts/society always discriminates against abusers.

Stop laying all this crap on fascists, it's racists that are the problem.

Also by this logic because terrorists kill civilians in their war against us we should kill civilians as well.

[Graveland]

Originally Posted by Neo2012
As my signature says, The fascists are always whining about being discriminated against. It's quite simple, if the fascists dont want to be descriminated against, they should stop discriminating against others.

pedophile's, fascists, the courts/society always discriminates against abusers.


Why do people who espouse democracy as the way forward act so shocked when a group of people collectively disagree with the 'established' proxy position.

I do believe that if the BNP ever got into power the country would be in more trouble than if we let all of Asia in, however this is not to say that nationalism isn't a viable aspiration of a people who are commonly united by race and culture. If ideas and relationships can be used as a basis for securing a stable society why is it so bizarre to some that others factor in race?

[Graveland]

Why is it perfectly acceptable for religions to be commonly bound by ideas, but a society not be bound by racial commonality? Provided world domination is not the goal what is the problem?
The idea of diversity itself needs distinct cultural and racial differences present else we all become the same. And who wants to live in a world where we're all the same?

[newspresenter]

As my signature says, The fascists are always whining about being discriminated against. It's quite simple, if the fascists dont want to be descriminated against, they should stop discriminating against others.

So you're against the far left discriminating against the BNP.

[newspresenter]

Why is it perfectly acceptable for religions to be commonly bound by ideas, but a society not be bound by racial commonality? Provided world domination is not the goal what is the problem?
The idea of diversity itself needs distinct cultural and racial differences present else we all become the same. And who wants to live in a world where we're all the same?

There is no difference in your first point. There is however an artificial belief put forward by those who wish to demonise their enimies, that difference exists.
Second point, no one does, not even those in political positions who're marxist in belief, what they do want is to see the masses squirm while they watch from above.

[Neo2012]

Why is it perfectly acceptable for religions to be commonly bound by ideas, but a society not be bound by racial commonality? Provided world domination is not the goal what is the problem?
The idea of diversity itself needs distinct cultural and racial differences present else we all become the same. And who wants to live in a world where we're all the same?

diversity is about freedom. Freedom to grow more alike, or diverse, as YOU wish, without the state imposing hemogeniety.

BNP constituition;
The British National Party stands for the preservation of the national and ethnic character of the British people and is wholly opposed to any form of racial integration between British and non-European peoples. It is therefore committed to stemming and reversing the tide of non-white immigration and to restoring, by legal changes, negotiation and consent, the overwhelmingly white makeup of the British population that existed in Britain prior to 1948.



So if relious groups want to impose their superstitions upon us, I do not accept that either.

Lastly, I have more in common with my Asian neighbour than I do the lowlife money grubbing fascist Griffin.




PS Why are the fascist BNP promoting racial integration between British and European peoples? I thought they were proud to be British?

[MarkMuses]

diversity is about freedom. Freedom to grow more alike, or ...

Utter claptrap. Neither does the word relate to freedom or growing more alike as you put it.

[Graveland]

So what about the freedom to remain homogeneous neo? Or is that one freedom too many? It doesn't bother me in the slightest that you have no wish to preserve your culture or heritage, that's your decision, but given that you don't perhaps you should live somewhere like America, that is a true country of immigrants, not Europe which is the cradle of Caucasian ancestory. I find it most peculiar that the destruction of the white races of this world is treated with such little concern, but that at every opportunity Black or Asian identity is promoted to the hilt as a desirable entity.
If the black populations of Africa were to be minorities in their own lands within 100 years wouldn't there be uproar?

[Neo2012]

So you're against the far left discriminating against the BNP.

pedophile's, fascists, the courts/society always discriminates against abusers. When the fascists prove they've stopped being abusers, the courts/society will stop boycotting/punishing their abuse. It's NOT the party that is being punished. It is the abuse, there discrimination, which both society and the courts are punishing. This is no different to any of the law abiding person.

[Neo2012]

So what about the freedom to remain homogeneous neo? Or is that one freedom too many? It doesn't bother me in the slightest that you have no wish to preserve your culture or heritage, that's your decision, but given that you don't perhaps you should live somewhere like America, that is a true country of immigrants, not Europe which is the cradle of Caucasian ancestory. I find it most peculiar that the destruction of the white races of this world is treated with such little concern, but that at every opportunity Black or Asian identity is promoted to the hilt as a desirable entity.
If the black populations of Africa were to be minorities in their own lands within 100 years wouldn't there be uproar?

MarkMuses and Graveland, what % racial mix satisfy your desire for racial homogenaity? How many black's, asians etc would you tolerate? Why do you wan't to live in a country where we're all the same race??

Do you accept black's, asians etc a perfectly capable of becoming a culturally British, integration. Are you arguing for integration, rather than segregation?

ps

[MarkMuses]

MarkMuses and Graveland, what % racial mix satisfy your desire for racial homogenaity? How many black's, asians etc would you tolerate? Why do you wan't to live in a country where we're all the same race??

Do you accept black's, asians etc a perfectly capable of becoming a culturally British, integration. Are you arguing for integration, rather than segregation?

ps

Questions questions questions... oh Lordy.

1."% racial mix?" Pre-mass immigration. Genetic studies clearly show Britain was essentially homogeneous prior to the effects of the Nationality Act 1948. However, there is no return to that reality as Griffin has explained on multiple occasions as I dare say you know very well.

2. "How many blacks and asians?" Being such a pathelogically evil hateful person I can only tolerate a few Neo. Enough to enjoy the odd curry/chinky like we all do. Oh the diversity... Heaven help me.

3. "Why do you want to live...same race country?" For the same reason a Thompson's gazelle is happy to exist, such that no Lefty Gazelle declares all antelope the same and sets about its extinction. DIVERSITY Neo. Your lot crow about it often enough, but your own racism is squarely against real DIVERSITY so dig yourself out of that one.

4. "..accept blacks/asians...capable of becoming culturally British?" Yes. All races can adopt a culture. They can "go native", making some degree of racial mixing potentially absorbable. However, if the volume of immigration exceeds this negligible position clearly the host race is subsumed and lost. So bye bye the character of the racial group that built it and their forefathers that died for it.

[Neo2012]

4. "..accept blacks/asians...capable of becoming culturally British?" Yes. All races can adopt a culture.

Good! Do you think Griffin/BNP hardcore accept that?

　

1."% racial mix?" Pre-mass immigration. Genetic studies clearly show Britain was essentially homogeneous prior to the effects of the Nationality Act 1948. However, there is no return to that reality as Griffin has explained on multiple occasions as I dare say you know very well.

and yet it remains in their 2008 constitution under " section 1 POLITICAL OBJECTIVES"

(b) The British National Party stands for the preservation of the national and ethnic character of the British people and is wholly opposed to any form of racial integration between British and non-European peoples. It is therefore committed to stemming and reversing the tide of non-white immigration and to restoring, by legal changes, negotiation and consent, the overwhelmingly white make up of the British population that existed in Britain prior to 1948.

　
PS. Just because this topic interests me,
"Genetic studies clearly show Britain was essentially homogeneous prior to the effects of the Nationality Act 1948" What studies? homogeneous European, or homogeneous English Welsh Scottish and Irish? As the BNP constitution allows anyone who is white European membership, in other words the BNP acknowledges there is no homogeneous genetic British ethnic group, I would be surprised your study contradicts this. I've always thought it funny. If the BNP with to be true to their beliefs, they should be the European Nationalist Party.
http://www.youtube.com/v/lFAN3iq9_h4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en& feature=player_embedded&fs=1%22%3E%3C/param%3E%3Cparam

[MarkMuses]

Good! Do you think Griffin/BNP hardcore accept that?

　
and yet it remains in their 2008 constitution under " section 1 POLITICAL OBJECTIVES"
　
PS. Just because this topic interests me,
"Genetic studies clearly show Britain was essentially homogeneous prior to the effects of the Nationality Act 1948" What studies? homogeneous European, or homogeneous English Welsh Scottish and Irish? As the BNP constitution allows anyone who is white European membership, in other words the BNP acknowledges there is no homogeneous genetic British ethnic group, I would be surprised your study contradicts this. I've always thought it funny. If the BNP with to be true to their beliefs, they should be the European Nationalist Party.
http://www.youtube.com/v/lFAN3iq9_h4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en& feature=player_embedded&fs=1%22%3E%3C/param%3E%3Cparam

Clearly by your clip you intend to play down mass immigration. "Dont panic?" Oh of course little englanders irrationally panicking, "there, there". Doesn't wash with me. Andrew Neather made it very clear what you lot are really doing. Then of course you go on about hardcore BNP elements. Oooh scary but never about the ultra Leftists in the unions or any political party. I'm not playing your biased game Neo.

[Pleasant]

I think in a democracy this sort of treatment should be considered criminal. The right to vote for any one we choose is a human right.

Democracy in this country stinks.

[MarkMuses]

"Democracy in this country stinks." yep, and the last one outdid previous one for third world standards

[Neo2012]

Clearly by your clip you intend to play down mass immigration. "Dont panic?" Oh of course little englanders irrationally panicking, "there, there". Doesn't wash with me. Andrew Neather made it very clear what you lot are really doing. Then of course you go on about hardcore BNP elements. Oooh scary but never about the ultra Leftists in the unions or any political party. I'm not playing your biased game Neo.

No, the video illustrates what I said, they are not the ethno British Nationalist Party, they are the ethno European Nationalist Party. As long a you are white, you can join.

[MarkMuses]

What the video illustrates is a carefully crafted whitewash.

More interestingly your, point about the BNP is this. Are they the British National Party (a party defined by indigenous Britons) or should they call themselves the White Nationalist Party (a party defined by pan-European racial identity)? Right?

I think you have the answer. Visit Stormfront. The National Front are effectively the "white nationalist party". The BNP are deemed jew loving, ok to marry an east asian, okay to do this do that sell-out party.

Now my view is this. I am happy to accept white group identity. I just don't think of it in isolation. I care about all races. My outlook is more in line with Enoch Powell. Fluent in 8 languages, note 'fluent', and he knew more besides that - hardly an isolationist ickle Enlander. He understood the world, understood nature, understood too much. Worst still, he had honour. He did not buckle under PC **** but told it like it is. No hater, no Nazi - he fought the Nazis FFS! And that is what the BNP is blindly groping towards despite their NF ancestry. That's what's going on, even some of them don't know it yet but they are coming home because extremism is, and always will be a big fail. and I include the fascistic white hating thought crime **** you folllow in that too.

I expect you will now type "LOL" followed by some blithe nonsense. But there really are decent patriots around still Neo. I am one of them and your true enemy.

[Graveland]

What the video illustrates is a carefully crafted whitewash.

More interestingly your, point about the BNP is this. Are they the British National Party (a party defined by indigenous Britons) or should they call themselves the White Nationalist Party (a party defined by pan-European racial identity)? Right?

I think you have the answer. Visit Stormfront. The National Front are effectively the "white nationalist party". The BNP are deemed jew loving, ok to marry an east asian, okay to do this do that sell-out party.

Now my view is this. I am happy to accept white group identity. I just don't think of it in isolation. I care about all races. My outlook is more in line with Enoch Powell. Fluent in 8 languages, note 'fluent', and he knew more besides that - hardly an isolationist ickle Enlander. He understood the world, understood nature, understood too much. Worst still, he had honour. He did not buckle under PC **** but told it like it is. No hater, no Nazi - he fought the Nazis FFS! And that is what the BNP is blindly groping towards despite their NF ancestry. That's what's going on, even some of them don't know it yet but they are coming home because extremism is, and always will be a big fail. and I include the fascistic white hating thought crime **** you folllow in that too.

I expect you will now type "LOL" followed by some blithe nonsense. But there really are decent patriots around still Neo. I am one of them and your true enemy.

Never a truer word spoken...

[Pleasant]

Yes it was a fantastic post.

[octopus]

Wayne Brown should have kept his gob shut. End of.

In a supposed democracy, why should he?

[vansailor]

so much for free speech the bnp is not a banned organization also why would you call your party british the term british means everyone english scots welsh and northern island and british passport holders is this a case for trading standards

[octopus]

so much for free speech the bnp is not a banned organization also why would you call your party british the term british means everyone english scots welsh and northern island and british passport holders is this a case for trading standards

In a free country, why shouldn"t they be allowed to call it what they want, and have as members who they want? We don"t have to join, if we don"t approve.

[MarkMuses]

so much for free speech the bnp is not a banned organization also why would you call your party british the term british means everyone english scots welsh and northern island and british passport holders is this a case for trading standards

Banning them is perhaps a little too obviously anti-democratic. Bankrupting them through the courts appears to be the plan by the EHRC.

Regarding Britain, there are of course two uses of the term British, as in governmental state (eg. passports) and British as in geography (eg. ethnic origin).

Since mass immigration in which instant-Britishness is handed out to anyone the distinction has been made more acute forcing the terms "civic British" and "ethnic British" to describe our demographics. The indigenous, contrary to Leftist propaganda are scientifically validated as highly homogenous prior to the programme of state ethnocide against our own people (re: Andrew Neather) running at least to 80% for resident DNA haplogroups dating back to the end of the last ice age. However, Parliament voted that native Brits don't exist. An astonishing demonstration of group self-hatred to facilitate Britain's ethnic destruction.

[Midas]

The indigenous, contrary to Leftist propaganda are scientifically validated as highly homogenous prior to the programme of state ethnocide against our own people (re: Andrew Neather) running at least to 80% for resident DNA haplogroups dating back to the end of the last ice age. However, Parliament voted that native Brits don't exist. An astonishing demonstration of group self-hatred to facilitate Britain's ethnic destruction.

When was that, do you have a reference? I don't recall having read about it. If so it is really quite appalling!!

[MarkMuses]

When was that, do you have a reference? I don't recall having read about it. If so it is really quite appalling!!

Here is the Early Day Motion:

Horwood, Martin
That this House welcomes the 20th anniversary of International Labour Organisation Convention 169 on Tribal and Indigenous Peoples, which recognises and respects the land rights of indigenous peoples; notes that protecting the land rights of indigenous peoples is the most effective way to protect the world's rainforests, crucial in the battle against climate change; further welcomes a memorandum submitted to the Environment Audit Committee by the Department for International Development and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs which recognises the importance of ensuring indigenous peoples' rights are respected in terms of ownership of the carbon asset; notes the Government's continued refusal to put these rights on a firm legal footing and ratify Convention 169, on the grounds that there are no indigenous peoples in the United Kingdom; further notes that this has not prevented either the Netherlands or Spain from joining the list of 20 countries, including Brazil, that have ratified the Convention; believes that protecting the rights of indigenous peoples is a matter of international concern; and calls on the Government to ratify Convention 169 without delay.

UK Parliament - Early Day Motions By Details

It was An Early Day Motion with 122 signatures. I can't work out whether it is passed or not. So I might be wrong in saying Parliament voted this through.

It is pretty shocking and insulting that this thing even exists.

[Midas]

Here is the Early Day Motion:
UK Parliament - Early Day Motions By Details

It was An Early Day Motion with 122 signatures. I can't work out whether it is passed or not. So I might be wrong in saying Parliament voted this through.

It is pretty shocking and insulting that this thing even exists.

Thanks for the link, and yes, it is shocking it even exists! More interesting than just the list of signatories is the analysis of their political allegiances, with all but 4 of the 122 coming from left or centre left parties, those who tried so hard during Labour's last government to swamp this country with immigrants whilst at the same time denying there's such a thing as an indigenous Briton, no doubt in a forlorn efforts to justify their claims that they're not diluting the British culture

[MarkMuses]

Thanks for the link, and yes, it is shocking it even exists! More interesting than just the list of signatories is the analysis of their political allegiances, with all but 4 of the 122 coming from left or centre left parties, those who tried so hard during Labour's last government to swamp this country with immigrants whilst at the same time denying there's such a thing as an indigenous Briton, no doubt in a forlorn efforts to justify their claims that they're not diluting the British culture

That seems to be exactly what's going on. Well put. I wish we had one good MP in that rotten house who would stand up and say as much.

[AMGINGLES]

Government lead demonisation , im just suprised they havent compared him to hitler yet.