Politics Forum and Political Blog discussing and debating political and social issues.


Go Back   Politics Forum and Political Blog discussing and debating political and social issues. > Politics and Political Issues Forum > United Kingdom Politics > UK Political and Union scandals

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-08-2007, 03:24 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 828
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Trevortt is an unknown quantity at this point
Exclamation Alzheimer's drugs remain limited

Campaigners have failed in their High Court bid to force the NHS to fund Alzheimer's drugs in people with early-stage disease.

However, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has been told to rewrite guidance on how the disease is assessed.
The Court upheld NICE's decision that the drugs are only cost-effective in later-stage disease.

It is the first time a judicial review had been sought on NICE guidance.
Drugs company Eisai brought the case to the High Court with support from fellow drugs firms Pfizer and Shire and the Alzheimer's Society.

They were successful on one count - that tests to assess Alzheimer's are discriminatory in people with learning difficulties or those who speak English as a second language.

But claims that NICE did not properly evaluate the impact of the drugs on the quality of life of carers and that the figures on the cost of long-term care used in their analysis were too low were not upheld by the court.
The judge dismissed two further claims of irrationality and procedural fairness.
That means patients with early-stage Alzheimer's will still not be recommended for funding.

Recommendations
NICE guidance in 2001 recommended the drugs - which can make it easier to carry out everyday tasks - should be used as standard.
But guidance published in November 2006, after months of appeals, stated that the drugs should only be prescribed to people with moderate-stage disease.

NICE said the drugs, which cost about £2.50 a day, did not make enough of a difference to recommend them for all patients and were not good value for money.

Andrew Dillon, chief executive of NICE said: "Our guidance stands and the drugs continue to be recommended only for people with moderate Alzheimer's disease, but the court has asked us to clarify our guidance when it is used for certain groups.

"Alzheimer's disease is a devastating illness, but the evidence indicates that these drugs are simply not effective for some patients.

"That is why we also issued advice last year on the broader support that should be provided for people with Alzheimer's disease and those who care for them, creating core standards for the NHS and care homes that will make a real difference for patients and their families."

Harriet Millward, deputy chief executive of the UK's largest dementia research charity, the Alzheimer's Research Trust, said: "We are devastated that these drugs will remain unavailable on the NHS to people with early-stage Alzheimer's when they might benefit from them.

"We urgently need to do more research to find better treatments, but research is currently hugely underfunded - we are scraping for every penny to fund vital work."

But Mervyn Kohler, Help the Aged special adviser said the ruling represented "some progress".
"It is important that NICE examines its guidance on these drugs, not just in the light of the ruling today but bearing in mind the public concern which the case has demonstrated."

Gordon Lishman, director general of Age Concern, said the ruling was disappointing.

"The drugs can cost as little as £2.50 a day per person and could make day-to-day life far more manageable for thousands of people."
But Professor Richard Gray, director of the University of Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, said the court made the right decision.
"The benefits from these drugs for Alzheimer's disease are so small that the only way you can tell if a patient is taking the drug or taking a dummy tablet is if they get side-effects such as nausea or diarrhoea."

Source
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Tags
alzheimer , drugs , limited , remain


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Britain Betrayed — Terror Suspects Remain Despite Deportation Pledge Trevortt Crime and Policing in the UK 1 22-08-2008 11:20 AM
EU competition to remain in place stevectaylor Money 0 22-06-2007 08:34 PM
NHS 'paying too much for drugs' stevectaylor Money 0 20-02-2007 10:14 AM
US sees limited economic growth stevectaylor Money 0 07-09-2006 01:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:39 AM.


Bargainarena LimitedAd Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84