Kent correspondent reports.
Apparently emails aplenty are being exchanged in cyber “UKIP-Land” this evening - according to our Kent British National Party correspondent.

The reason?

Why a former UKIP member has apparently had the good sense to “tell it as it is” following that Party’s disastrous showing (2.9%) in its Horsham stronghold yesterday – a result that has sent shockwaves reverberating through that party. Our correspondent, who is himself a refugee from that organisation, has - like a great many other members and ex-members - been in receipt of a controversial email earlier today, that makes for some very interesting reading!

However, to be critical, there is one crucial point not stressed to the point it deserves to be in the email that is worth mentioning! And that's UKIP is as committed to multiculturalism as are Labour, Conservatives, Lib-Dems, Scottish Nationalists, Greens and Plaid Cymru! Their spokesman in Horsham summed their position up very nicely in a comment reprinted by the local newspaper:

”People often make the mistake of thinking that UKIP and the BNP are similar in outlook. True, we are both opposed to rule from Brussels, but where we part company is race – to the BNP this is of fundamental importance, whereas to UKIP it is a matter of supreme indifference”.

In other words, although UKIP (like the BNP) wants Britain out of the European Union it matters not a hoot to them that their independent Britain will be so “cosmopolitan” that native Britons may be a minority in their own country - as we are currently in many London boroughs, Slough and parts of many northern and Midlands towns and cities! According to UKIP’s spokesmen and policy none of that matters – indeed it is "a matter of supreme indifference!”

The de-facto extinction of the British nation "a matter of supreme indifference"? - We think not!

The email currently being circulated amongst UKIP members.

Dear UKIP members, given the disastrous result for UKIP in yesterday's by-election in Horsham, Sussex. Plus the resignation of Gerard Batten MEP from the NEC, in protest against the decision (pushed forward by Nigel Farage) to ignore the expressed wish of Conference to stand UKIP candidates against all Tory candidates. I thought it appropriate to send to you the letter from Nick Griffin, originally handed out to some of the delegates at the October UKIP conference in Telford.

The attachment provides the information mentioned in the letter below, as well as some additional material. Please take a few moments to find out about the real BNP. You may be surprised at what you find. For the real BNP is very different to the image given to it by the media. To take but one example, do you take as gospel anything the BBC says about the EU? Of course not. So why believe them when they attack the BNP.

I used to be like so many of you, believing blindly that the BNP were racist thugs. But I was challenged to go and find out for myself the truth, and, I found I'd been lied to. All I ask is that you do likewise.

Dear UKIP member and fellow democratic patriot,

I hope that you find the enclosed samples of British National Party literature both interesting and informative. You will discover in them just how much the BNP and the majority of UKIP members share in common when it comes to our concerns for our nation and the remedies we believe are needed to put things right.

There is no need to remind you that, despite all your sterling efforts and many sacrifices, all is not well in UKIP. The shattering resignations of Marcus Stead, Richard Suchorzewski, Tony Butcher, Gill Chant, Peter Watson, and Simon Muir; the disgraceful mismanagement of party funds; the embarrassing inability to meet Electoral Commission deadlines for the submission of last year’s accounts, and the intolerable persecution of stalwarts like Peter Baker – for the ‘crime’ of writing to Roger Knapman to criticise his Polish labourers caper – these are only the latest in a long line of disasters to befall UKIP under its increasingly Stalinesque leadership.
The agenda of this conference is itself a prime example of the way in which the spin and undemocratic manipulation which are endemic in the Labour and Tory parties have spread to UKIP’s leadership as well. Just look at the motions which Nigel Farage’s cabal have promulgated for debate this weekend: Trivial waffle on drink driving and the election of law lords, and a cynically stage-managed ‘debate’ on immigration, designed to con the party rank-and-file into thinking that your very well-founded concerns about the transformation of Britain are being addressed.

The truth is that Nigel Farage is bent on dragging UKIP down a politically correct blind alley over immigration. Just look at his proposals: Ban Bulgarians and Poles (except, presumably, the ones in Mr. Knapman’s attic), but allow in each year as many African and Asian economic refugees as native ‘Brits’ emigrate. This zero net immigration policy is nothing more or less than a plan to replace the British people in our own homeland.

We in the BNP ask the question which we know many of you have waited in vain to hear from UKIP spokesmen: what on earth is the point of winning back the lost freedoms of Britain if the British people who created them in the first place are condemned by continued foreign immigration, native emigration, and differential birth rates to become oppressed minority milch-cows in the land our forebears built? Our ancient freedoms and institutions were not created and will not be maintained by something magic in the English air; they grew from and reflect the inherited and cultural characteristics of the indigenous people of our land. Change the people, as Mr Farage recommends, and everything our ancestors created will be replaced by institutions which reflect the nature, cultures and religions of the newcomers.

Is this policy of genetic and cultural modification really appropriate for a party of British patriotism and common sense? Shouldn’t you at least be allowed to debate the issue seriously at your Conference, rather than being palmed off with an absurd attempt to import from the empty vastness of Australia a ‘points system’ wholly unsuitable for one of the most overcrowded countries on earth? Australia can still solve its problem simply by shutting the door. Take a look at London, Birmingham, Manchester and Bradford and ask yourself if Bulgarians and Romanians are really the biggest danger that Britain faces.

The other essential motion, which is conspicuous by its continued absence is a debate about the disgraceful vote on 27th Jan last year when UKIP’s MEPs – contrary to the Party Constitution – supported a motion calling for closer European economic, political and social integration; for the outlawing of xenophobia (defined by the EU as including hostility to the Euro!) and for pro-federalist brainwashing in our schools.

Isn’t that more worthy of Conference time than drink-driving?
The great tragedy is that our beleaguered nation simply does not have the time to dodge paramount issues such as these, and that UKIP under the Farage cabal has in recent years allowed itself to be manipulated by the Europhiles in the old parties and the mass media. The way in which New Labour spin master Max Clifford arranged for Robert Kilroy-Silk, Joan Collins and Damian Hockney to use UKIP in the last European and Assembly Elections to block the BNP and then to demoralise the Euro-realist movement by causing the Veritas split was a classic dirty tricks operation.

Unfortunately, the generally well-intentioned drive to encourage UKIP candidates to contest more and more seats in local elections is being used in the same way. In Barking and Dagenham, for example, UKIP’s slate at the last Council elections was organised by the brother of a senior Labour Councillor, in the vain hope of splitting the patriotic vote enough to keep out the BNP. Similarly, UKIP’s campaign in our West Midlands target borough of Dudley was aided by donations of expertise and money from Labour party backers.

The way in which the Farage cabal continues to co-operate with the far left magazine Searchlight is another example of the way in which UKIP is being manipulated by anti-British and pro-federalist forces which wish none of us any good. It is also worth remembering that the same magazine use the same tactics as far back as the 1970s to manipulate and split the Monday Club – and has since used membership details that it obtained with the self-serving connivance of their leadership to impede the careers of a number of talented patriots in institutions such as the BBC. To allow a repeat performance and to permit the political and media establishment to encourage patriotic democrats to get into each other’s way is madness.

If, despite the continuing leadership crisis in UKIP, you feel that you have to soldier on, then I ask that you at least have a glance through the enclosed literature and, having seen for yourself just how much we have in common, do what you can to co-operate at local level with BNP activists to avoid splitting the pro-British vote (as we did in Bromley). If, on the other hand, the latest leadership shenanigans are the final straw for you, you will find your real home in the British National Party. Either way, with the power of the totalitarian EU octopus growing all the time, our nation cannot afford the luxury of two patriotic parties competing for the votes of the British people.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Yours faithfully,

Nick Griffin

Chairman, British National Party

http://www.bnp.org.uk/reg_showarticl...contentID=1623

__________________
"England expects that every man will do his duty"............