| IT IS WAR
On 2 May 2008, The Daily Mail reported thus: Quote: |
A man who raped a frail mother of three while HIV positive is trying to escape deportation.
| Quote:
Linkoy Muhuri, a failed asylum seeker from the Congo, claims he faces dangers in his own country because of his medical condition and his ethnicity.
The former hairdresser, 40, was jailed for ten years after attacking the Aids counsellor, 34, who has sickle cell anaemia and had her feet covered in bandages at the time.
During his prison sentence, he has been eligible for free treatment for HIV worth tens of thousands of pounds. | Congolese rapist with HIV who raped mother of three fights deportation because of 'dangers' in his own country | the Daily Mail On 2 December 2003, Linkoy Muhuri was jailed for raping a mother-of-three. In court, he claimed the lady in question encouraged him to have sex with her. The jury at the Old Bailey heard that he and his victim (an AIDS counsellor) chatted for two hours about the disease before he attacked her. She said: Quote: |
He was like an animal. I could not believe he would do this to me after what we had been talking about.
| Judge Richard Hawkins rejected a call for leniency saying: Quote: |
I have to consider... the risk you represent. You are an HIV sufferer and you committed rape knowing that and without using a condom.
| He then jailed Muhuri for 10 years and recommended that, once freed, he be deported to the Congo. He was released after serving less than half his sentence and, as we have seen, is fighting the deportation recommended by the judge. Before he was arrested for rape, Mururi played the field with African abandon. It is not thought that he mentioned his illness to any of his girlfriends. During this time, he had a child with one of them. If his wife objected to this behaviour, she never mentioned it. Question: How many unknowing British people will be infected with the AIDS virus by sub-Saharan Africans before the government owns up to the dangers? Answer: It will never happen. The British government will never tell us that anyone who sleeps with someone from this part of the world is putting their health at tremendous risk. This tells me that the British government would rather we die than hurt the feelings of the poor asylum seeker who has no qualms about infecting us with the AIDS virus. This last statement applies to Muhuri’s lawyers as well. Is this OK by you? On 4 December 2003, the BBC web site reported thus: Quote: |
The young woman proudly shows off her sleeping baby to her visitor but this is not just a social call. For Marie is HIV positive, one of a large number of Africans living with HIV in Luton. Her boyfriend, from whom she probably contracted the virus, has abandoned her, and she now lives in a cramped bed-sit with her month-old daughter.
| Quote:
Marie, 21, arrived two years ago from Zimbabwe but was diagnosed HIV positive earlier this year…
Marie is living in an area with one of the fastest growing number of HIV and Aids cases in the country, between 1998 and 2000 the number of cases being diagnosed in Bedfordshire nearly quadrupled.
By 2000 nearly two thirds of the county's cases were among black Africans who make up just under 1% of the population… Black Africans are being diagnosed HIV positive at a faster rate than any other group in the UK.
Nearly three-quarters of HIV infections among heterosexuals diagnosed in 2001/2002 were probably acquired in Africa, according to the recent annual report on HIV and Aids by the Health Protection Agency… Nationally a third of HIV cases are believed to be as yet undiagnosed but those working in the field says that figure is likely to be much higher among Africans…
The fact that such a large proportion of HIV cases in Luton and Bedfordshire are to be found among the African population has long been acknowledged by the local health authority and other HIV agencies…
The local health authority no longer keeps a breakdown of HIV cases in the region by ethnicity. | One month after the warning cited above, on 2 January 2004, the BBC also told us this: Quote: |
Ministers have been urged against introducing mandatory HIV tests for every immigrant arriving in the UK. The Institute for Public Policy Research, a leading left-wing think tank, says such a move could create more problems than it would solve…
| Quote:
The review was prompted in part by figures which show that most new cases of HIV in the UK are diagnosed in people who came to the country from abroad. According to the Health Protection Agency, two out of three heterosexuals who are now diagnosed with the disease contracted it in Africa…
But in its report, the IPPR says mandatory screening is ineffective, costly and may have negative rather than positive impacts on public health. It suggests that the public are being misled about the benefits of introducing the tests…
‘The compulsory screening of asylum seekers for TB and HIV which is being proposed by some will have a limited impact on the spread of these diseases because screening for TB is ineffective and compulsion may push those carrying infectious disease underground’, said Heather Crawley, associate director of the IPPR.
‘There are also ethical and moral implications of returning those diagnosed with HIV back to countries of origin... The government should avoid the temptation of introducing compulsory screening in order to cool the political heat on this issue'. | On 15 February 2005, The Guardian told us this: Quote: |
The Conservatives have heated up the immigration debate by announcing proposals to tighten health checks on all foreigners from outside the European Union (EU) applying to live in the UK...
| Quote:
Under the plans unveiled by Tory leader Michael Howard today, all non-EU migrants will be tested for tuberculosis (TB) if they are coming for more than six months. Those who want to settle for the long-term will be required to undergo a full medical examination, usually including tests for TB, hepatitis and HIV, paid for by themselves before departing from their home country...
Under the plans, anyone who tests positive for TB would automatically have their visa applications turned down, while those with other conditions - including HIV - would be dealt with on a case-by-case basis...
Migrant specialist Danny Sriskandarajah, of the Institute for Public Policy Research, said the proposals were flawed as they would not cover the substantial proportion of British citizens who contract HIV while overseas, nor eastern European countries with high rates of TB and HIV, which have recently joined the EU.
Mr Sriskandarajah added that the Conservatives were scaremongering by 'overplaying the link between immigration and disease'. He said:
It lends legitimacy to the idea that we're being swamped by disease-ridden immigrants and health tourists when there is no evidence that is the case.' | No evidence Danny? So this is b***ocks, is it? Quote: |
Nearly three-quarters of HIV infections among heterosexuals diagnosed in 2001/2002 were probably acquired in Africa, according to the recent annual report on HIV and Aids by the Health Protection Agency…
| Quote:
The fact that such a large proportion of HIV cases in Luton and Bedfordshire are to be found among the African population has long been acknowledged by the local health authority and other HIV agencies. | Danny Sriskandarajah is the Director of Research Strategy, Head of Migration, Equalities & Citizenship at the Institute of Policy Research.. He joined the IPPR in the same month the January 2004 report cited above was released and had nothing to do with the advice offered within it. However, what he says here suggests that said advice would be not have been substantially different if he had authored the report himself. This is Sriskandarajah: It is war, ladies and gentlemen. The powers-that-be are at war with the vast majority of those who voted them into power. The Linkoy Muhuris are the foot-soldiers of those who want us gone.  |
04-05-2008, 12:37 PM
LinkBacks (?)
Threaded Mode
