911 Decapitation Operation in Pasadena against ZHANG Hongbao, who is a China’s outstanding political leader and met with disaster in Pasadena
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Major consolidated report《The Decapitation Operation below the Rocky Mountain》Part I

“911 Decapitation Operation” was miserably defeated; ZHANG Hongbao won
three rounds out of three in the United States in the fight against persecution
------- A belated true account of the close of the criminal court case of
HE Nanfang vs. ZHANG Hongbao

Capitol Hill independent writer Fredric Wilson

Reported by Capitol Hill independent writer Fredric Wilson from Pasadena on March 15.


Today is the third anniversary of the false frame-up of ZHANG Hongbao after he settled down in Pasadena. Two weeks ago, which was February 28, the criminal court of the Los Angeles Superior Court in Pasadena rendered a final probation and sentence hearing on the five felonies of “kidnapping”, “assault with a deadly weapon”, “false imprisonment”, “dissuading a witness from report”, and “making criminal threat” that HE Nanfang had filed against ZHANG Hong-Ba. [sic] The final judgment is that all of the five felonies [charges] were dismissed; the US$ 150,000 “medical expenses” restitution and the imprisonment of ZHANG Hongbao for at least ten years demanded by the prosecution and HE Nanfang were denied. Even the agreement for payment of US$ 1,000 court costs by ZHANG Hongbao was cancelled. Nevertheless, the previous stay away orders that bar ZHANG Hongbao from getting near HE Nanfang remains in full force and effect. As such, the curtain comes down on this time consuming criminal case, which called for forty hearings and lasted three years, with ZHANG Hongbao winning the case.

This writer, being an eyewitness at the court trial on February 28, should have issued this article immediately. However, because the court trial termination documents were done only on March 3, and it took time to obtain the original documents for review and to translate the court trial documents and this article from Chinese to English and vice versa, this writer did not want to issue this article hastily. By doing so, this big case, which has caused a huge stir in the media in China mainland, the United States, and even around the world, can be reported prudently; at the same time a strong counter-strike can be launched against the twisted reports of the media, such as “The China Press” and the Justice Party, that are utilized by the Chinese Communist. In any case, this is a belated report; this writer can only make up for the blemish of lateness with a detailed true account of the court trial.

I. Inside and outside the court room

The case against ZHANG Hongbao, which contained five felony counts, was heard for the 40th time at the Los Angeles Superior Court North West District (Pasadena Court) Criminal Court H, at 8:30 a.m. on February 28. On ZHANG Hongbao’s side, only he himself and his attorney appeared in court. On HE Nanfang’s side, a team of twenty some people showed up. The team included four prosecutors (this was something that had never happened before; usually, only one prosecutor on the case would appear in court), reporters from The China Press which is a mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist, JI Xiaofeng who has been accused to be a Chinese Communist spy on the internet, WANG Chi, who has close ties with the Chinese Consulate and claims to be a member of HE Nanfang’s defense team, a crowd of reporters who have been invited to come by the Chinese Communist (this crowd of reporters apparently had received prior notice about the final battle on this date; before this, the reporters, with the exception of the reporters of The China Press, had not shown up for twenty some hearings), people who were organized to come to watch and to cheer them on, and HE Nanfang’s civil case attorney. HE Nanfang herself held two big boards each of which measured one square meter. It appeared that the people on the side of HE Nanfang came prepared and ready for an all out fight in a decisive battle.

ZHANG Hongbao was still wearing the smart-looking dark blue suite that fitted him very well, a dark blue neck tie that made him look serene, profound, dignified, and confident; his rosy complexion made him appear a lot younger than his actual age. HE Nanfang, on the other hand, stuck closely with WANG Chi each step of the way; she wore a light brown overcoat with a long scarf wrapped around her neck; her shoulder length hair made her stout stature look even shorter; her face is wax yellow and haggard; she appeared nervous and uneasy. WANG Chi constantly gave her some instructions, and HE Nanfang constantly nodded her head uncomfortably. Because all of her hair was combed backward, a one-inch long knife scar was appeared slightly above HE Nanfang’s eyebrows. It has been reported that the knife scar was the result of her fight with someone in the past.

The atmosphere in court was somewhat different. ZHANG Hongbao seemed to feel it. After his lawyer Mark Geragos arrived at court, ZHANG immediately asked him to go outside the court to tell him his own views and requests. ZHANG clearly told his lawyer: If the other side did not heed the judge’s idea of a compromise and was adamant on adding unreasonable requests and created troubles, then we would fight from the very begining, from the five felonies all the way to the jury. The US$ 96,000 medical expenses demanded by the other side were a fabrication; we must not bear even one penny of that amount!

Sure enough, the prosecutor made a request for a verdict today to the court. The judge granted the request and ordered court hearing to begin at 1:30 in the afternoon with the judgment to be made after the hearing.

Court hearing began in the afternoon. Instead of the usual apparel, ZHANG Hongbao wore a royal blue leather jacket; he did not wear a neck tie; although he looked casual, he did not lose the seriousness for court appearance; he held a heavy folder in his hands, which displayed an attitude of being ready for battle. ZHANG Hong-Bao sat next to the reporter from The China Press, opened the folder, took out a tape, and told the reporter of The China Press: It was a voice recording of JI Xiaofeng telling another person to demand from ZHANG Hongbao a list of the 38,000,000 Zhong Gong members and information of all of the assets of Zhong Gong; the recording, which was given to him by a friend of his, would show the spy identity of JI Xiaofeng. In a while, he would give the tape to the court as evidence to let the judge to understand what kind of people were involved in the case so that the judge would have a better understanding of the background of the case. After a while, the reporter of The China Press left. Moments later, JI Xiaofeng disappeared and, to the end, was never seen again.

The hearing began. Mark Geragos, ZHANG Hongbao’s lawyer, presented his case to the court first. He mentioned only two points. First, the medical records in the court file showed that: When HE Nanfang examined at the Arcadia Hospital for the first time, the doctor has said that he did not see any bruise or swelling. After a customary examination, the doctor was of the opinion that hospitalization for observation was not necessary and HE Nanfang was sent home without even a prescription. The pictures produced by HE Nanfang showing black and purple bruises were taken several days later by someone that HE Nanfang had asked. Second, there were several discrepancies in HE Nanfang’s testimonies. Mark Geragos simply spoke three sentences on these two points. Although few words were spoken, they were clear, concise, to the point, and very persuasive. The Arcadia Hospital is a famous church hospital in Los Angeles; its practice of medicine is meticulous and its diagnoses are authoritative. If anyone who goes to the hospital for external injuries is considered to need treatment, he would be required to be hospitalized for several days for observation; during hospitalization, he would undergo complete physical examination several times and treatment would be given; he would be released by the doctor only when he is fit to go. The answer would be very obvious if there was no hospitalization, no prescription, and the authoritative diagnosis was “no bruise or swelling observed”. It is also a strong rebuttal to HE Nanfang’s claim of “serious loss of work capacity” when she demands a restitution of 20,000,000 dollars. Whether HE Nanfang’s bumps and bruises were caused herself or someone else was no longer important to the judge who was trying the case. The judge’s eyes showed approval. Mark brought up the second point very skillfully and artfully; he did not say that HE Nanfang lied, deceived the judge, or scorned the court; he just said that were “several discrepancies” in her testimonies. There could only be one account of one fact. What does it tell you when different accounts are given in different situations at different times? The judge must have felt that too after she read the records. Mark led everyone in court to find HE Nanfang’s word unacceptable. Mark lived up to his reputation as a top criminal defense lawyer in the United States; ZHANG Hongbao picked the right person.


(be continued)